京东健康互联网医院
网站导航

滨州医学院附属医院耳廓良性肿瘤专家

简介:

滨州医学院附属医院开诊于1977年10月;1995年5月被确认为三级甲等医院,成为第一轮次评审全国最年轻的三甲综合医院,也是当时鲁北地区唯一的三级甲等医院;2015年12月成为山东省首批7家省级区域医疗中心之一;2020年7月与滨州医学院第一临床医学院合署。2021年12月医院以优异成绩通过新一轮医院等级评审。建院以来坚持医疗、教学、科研并重,各项事业实现了又好又快发展,牢固确立了在黄河三角洲地区的医疗、教学、科研、康复和急救中心地位。医院占地面积13.3万平方米、业务用房建筑面积31.4万平方米,固定资产总额29.61亿元;拥有第四代达芬奇手术机器人、超高端螺旋CT、3.0T磁共振、PET-CT、医用回旋加速器等百万元以上专业设备242台(件),医疗仪器设备总值13.33亿元。医院现编制床位2852张,2022年在完成疫情防控和医疗救治任务的同时,实现总诊疗人次163.41万,出院人次12.92万,手术台次8.04万。医院狠抓医疗质量管理,提高诊疗服务水平,积极推进技术发展,肝胆胰肿瘤联合血管切除肝圆韧带重建技术、常温非体外循环下胸腹主动脉替换术、健侧颈7神经移位术治疗中枢性偏瘫、全内镜下颅内动脉瘤夹闭术、3D打印与精准治疗等新技术新项目应用于临床;大力倡导自主创新,培育发展人工智能、医学机器人、手术无痕、超显微外科、组织与器官移植、脏器功能支持、3D打印与精准治疗、干细胞与基因治疗、快速康复、肿瘤早诊早治新模式10类先进医疗技术,在疑难、危重、复杂、少罕见疾病诊治方面居黄河三角洲区域领先地位;全面推进“六大中心”建设,持续优化院内多学科协作及急危重症患者救治流程,获批国家高级卒中中心、国家级胸痛中心、省创伤中心、省危重孕产妇救治中心、省癌症规范化诊疗病房、区域危重儿童和新生儿救治中心。医院(学院)遵循医学教育规律和人才成长规律,充分发扬传、帮、带的优良教学传统,设有临床医学、儿科学、眼视光学3个本科专业,同时承担口腔医学、医学影像学、护理学等19个本科专业2000余名医学生的见习实习教学工作;有国家级一流本科专业1个、国家级高等学校特色专业1个、省级特色专业1个、省级一流本科专业3个,省级实验教学示范中心1个,国家一流本科课程2门,省精品课程及一流课程8门,继续教育数字化优质课程2门;作为临床医学学科建设牵头单位,获批省高校“高水平学科”建设学科;有3个一级学科硕士学位授权点,30个二级学科硕士学位授权点;有全国优秀教师1人,省级教学名师、优秀教师、师德标兵5人,省高校黄大年式教师团队1个;目前本科生2498人、研究生616人;近五年来,承担国家级科研项目18项、省部级科研项目63项、厅局级科研项目137项;获得山东省科技进步奖、医学科技奖、高等学校科学技术奖14项,其他厅局级科技成果63项;发表论文3000余篇,SCI收录论文300余篇,获批发明专利217项、实用新型专利177项。医院(学院)现有国家临床重点专科建设项目2个、省临床重点专科22个、省临床精品特色专科3个、省中医药临床重点专科2个、省孕产期保健特色专科1个、省医药卫生重点学科2个、省医药卫生重点实验室1个、省高等学校重点实验室1个、省教育厅高等学校国际合作联合实验室1个、省临床医学研究中心分中心6个;有4门学科进入2022年度中国医院科技量值(STEM)百强榜医院;是国家卫生健康委脑卒中筛查与防治基地医院、国家消化道早癌防治中心联盟单位、国家骨科手术机器人应用中心创建单位、全国首批消化道肿瘤MDT试点医院、全国首批加速康复外科(ERAS)骨科试点医院、全国首批肺癌规范诊疗质量控制试点单位、全国首批肝癌规范诊疗质量控制试点单位、全国“间质性肺疾病规范化诊疗中心建设”优秀单位、全国首批手功能康复专科培训基地。现有高级职称770人,博士、硕士1544人,硕博导师225名;有享受国务院政府特殊津贴专家4人、“泰山学者”等省级重点人才项目获得者15人,“渤海英才·杰出贡献专家”等市级人才项目获得者72人。成功获批博士后科研工作站。医院是国家住院医师规范化培训基地、国家临床药师培训基地、国家全科医师临床培养基地、国家万名护理人才培训基地、山东省医师变更执业范围培训定点机构、山东省康复医师转岗培训定点医院、山东省乡镇全科医师规范化培训基地、山东省康复医师培训基地、滨州市乡村医生培训基地;现有26个国家级住院医师规范化培训基地,2个省级继续教育培训基地;充分发挥省级区域医疗中心作用,医院与40余家基层医疗机构构建医联体及协作医院单位,牵头成立了35个黄河三角洲区域专科联盟并覆盖区域300余家医疗单位,免费培训乡村医生9000余名,提高了区域内基层医疗机构的医疗技术和管理水平。与美国、澳大利亚、新加坡、英国等多个国家的医院和学术机构建立了长期友好联系,400余名专业技术与管理人员赴境外学习,100余名国际知名专家来院访问。医院积极承担社会责任,完成重大事件救助任务和医疗保障近百次,获批“2022年北京冬奥会医疗保障单位”;在新冠肺炎疫情防控工作中,选拔4批医疗队伍共25名队员奔赴湖北防疫前线,2人次担任省派医疗队队长和省专家组组长,成功治愈滨城区首例新冠肺炎确诊病例,荣获“山东省抗击新冠肺炎疫情先进集体”荣誉称号,43人次获得“全国抗击新冠肺炎疫情先进个人”“全国优秀共产党员”“全国先进工作者”“全国优秀共青团员”等国家、省、市级荣誉;援青、援疆、援渝和援外工作受到国家和省卫健委表彰和高度评价;荣获山东省首批帮扶成效突出“业务院长”选派单位。积极参与公益慈善事业,“天使救心”工程受到中央电视台等多家媒体报道,“天使之旅”志愿服务项目获全国最佳志愿服务项目。现有国家级青年文明号1个,省级青年文明号11个和市级青年文明号12个。主动服务地方社会发展,荣获“‘富强滨州’建设奋斗攻坚奖先进集体”称号。作为山东省现代医院管理制度建设试点单位,积极推进现代医院管理制度建设,推动医院管理规范化、精益化、科学化,荣获中国现代医院管理表彰案例8项。深化公立医院绩效考核,连续两年获国家监测指标等级A+。获评2021年度省属事业单位服务高质量发展绩效考核优秀等次。深化“舒心就医”工程,在第七季改善医疗服务行动全国医院擂台赛获全国金奖,获全国改善医疗服务示范医院、山东省优质服务单位等荣誉称号。质量管理稳步提升,获评全国医院管理持续改进优秀单位及“第十届全国医院品管圈大赛”先进集体。推行就诊检查全预约和多学科综合门诊,获评全国改善医疗服务预约诊疗制度先进典型医院。深入开展“互联网+医疗健康”工作,顺利通过互联互通四级甲等测评,荣获省“智慧医院服务品牌”称号。医院坚持社会公益性质,以精湛的医术、规范的管理、良好的形象赢得了社会广泛赞誉,连续十年荣登中国医院竞争力地级城市医院百强榜,先后获全国卫生计生系统先进集体、全国百姓放心示范医院、中国人文爱心医院、山东省文明单位、山东省教育系统先进基层党组织等多项荣誉称号。是来源于皮肤的良性肿瘤,不发生转移,不易恶变,一般不影响健康,化学致癌物质,紫外线,电离辐射,病毒感染,遗传因素,免疫缺陷,耳,激光治疗,X线照射,外用药物治疗,线状苔藓,线状扁平苔藓,单侧线状型汗孔角化症,扁平疣。光线性角化病,色素痣,基底细胞癌,避免食用引起过敏的食物,体格检查,血常规检查,免疫功能检查,病理学检查,X线片检查,B超检查,CT检查,核素检查,物理检查,皮肤涂片,病理组织切片显微镜检查,。

齐广涛 副主任医师

擅长妇科肿瘤、妇科炎症、宫颈HPV感染、癌前病变等诊治,擅长宫腔镜、腹腔镜、单孔腹腔镜的妇科手术的操作。擅长妇科常见病及疑难危重疾病的诊断及规范化治疗!

好评 100%
接诊量 3885
平均等待 30分钟
擅长:擅长妇科肿瘤、妇科炎症、宫颈HPV感染、癌前病变等诊治,擅长宫腔镜、腹腔镜、单孔腹腔镜的妇科手术的操作。擅长妇科常见病及疑难危重疾病的诊断及规范化治疗!
更多服务
刘曼 主治医师

减重、减脂、增肥、增重、更年期肥胖、儿童肥胖、营养不良、缺锌、缺钙、缺铁、维生素缺乏,低体重、消瘦、营养性贫血、缺硒、孕期营养、肿瘤相关营养,放化疗营养、代谢障碍、儿童偏食、儿童营养不良、进食差、不爱吃饭、高脂血症饮食指导、甲亢,甲减、糖尿病饮食控制、高尿酸血症、便秘、腹泻相关营养指导、血液相关系统疾病饮食指导、家庭肠内肠外营养

好评 99%
接诊量 3144
平均等待 2小时
擅长:减重、减脂、增肥、增重、更年期肥胖、儿童肥胖、营养不良、缺锌、缺钙、缺铁、维生素缺乏,低体重、消瘦、营养性贫血、缺硒、孕期营养、肿瘤相关营养,放化疗营养、代谢障碍、儿童偏食、儿童营养不良、进食差、不爱吃饭、高脂血症饮食指导、甲亢,甲减、糖尿病饮食控制、高尿酸血症、便秘、腹泻相关营养指导、血液相关系统疾病饮食指导、家庭肠内肠外营养
更多服务
王忠永 主任医师

擅长皮炎、湿疹、荨麻疹、药疹等过敏性皮肤病,白癜风、黄褐斑等色素性皮肤病,带状疱疹、水痘、寻常疣等病毒性皮肤病,银屑病(牛皮癣)、玫瑰糠疹等红斑鳞屑性皮肤病,红斑狼疮、皮肌炎、天疱疮等自身免疫性和大疱性皮肤病,痤疮(青春痘)、脂溢性皮炎、酒渣鼻等面部皮肤病,过敏性紫癜、结节性红斑等血管炎性皮肤病,梅毒、淋病、非淋菌性尿道炎、尖锐湿疣等性病的诊断。

好评 99%
接诊量 3.2万
平均等待 1小时
擅长:擅长皮炎、湿疹、荨麻疹、药疹等过敏性皮肤病,白癜风、黄褐斑等色素性皮肤病,带状疱疹、水痘、寻常疣等病毒性皮肤病,银屑病(牛皮癣)、玫瑰糠疹等红斑鳞屑性皮肤病,红斑狼疮、皮肌炎、天疱疮等自身免疫性和大疱性皮肤病,痤疮(青春痘)、脂溢性皮炎、酒渣鼻等面部皮肤病,过敏性紫癜、结节性红斑等血管炎性皮肤病,梅毒、淋病、非淋菌性尿道炎、尖锐湿疣等性病的诊断。
更多服务
郭山伟 主治医师

妇科炎症,妇科肿瘤,宫颈疾病,产前筛查,孕期保健等妇产科专业知识

好评 100%
接诊量 68
平均等待 -
擅长:妇科炎症,妇科肿瘤,宫颈疾病,产前筛查,孕期保健等妇产科专业知识
更多服务
田恬 主治医师

行医十余年,临床经验丰富,擅长龋病、牙龈炎、牙周炎、重度牙周炎、龋病、牙体损伤、牙髓疾病(急慢性牙髓炎、急慢性根尖周炎)、口腔白斑、口腔扁平苔藓、复发性口腔溃疡、天疱疮、唇炎、舌炎等口腔常见疾病的诊治。 精通牙周病的序列诊疗、微创牙周刮治术、无痛牙周洁治术,根面平整术、美学树脂修复,显微根管治疗,根尖手术,微创种植修复、美学贴面、嵌体修复全冠美容修复等。

好评 -
接诊量 1
平均等待 15分钟
擅长:行医十余年,临床经验丰富,擅长龋病、牙龈炎、牙周炎、重度牙周炎、龋病、牙体损伤、牙髓疾病(急慢性牙髓炎、急慢性根尖周炎)、口腔白斑、口腔扁平苔藓、复发性口腔溃疡、天疱疮、唇炎、舌炎等口腔常见疾病的诊治。 精通牙周病的序列诊疗、微创牙周刮治术、无痛牙周洁治术,根面平整术、美学树脂修复,显微根管治疗,根尖手术,微创种植修复、美学贴面、嵌体修复全冠美容修复等。
更多服务
安超 主治医师

糖尿病饮食、营养性消瘦 、肥胖症、减肥、补钙、补硒、瘦身减肥、增肥增重、营养不良、缺锌、补钙、缺铁、单纯性肥胖、低体重、脂肪堆积、营养性贫血、更年期肥胖、孕期营养、化疗提高营养、体重减轻、代谢障碍、维生素D缺乏、营养缺乏、钙缺乏、严重营养不良

好评 99%
接诊量 2.9万
平均等待 -
擅长:糖尿病饮食、营养性消瘦 、肥胖症、减肥、补钙、补硒、瘦身减肥、增肥增重、营养不良、缺锌、补钙、缺铁、单纯性肥胖、低体重、脂肪堆积、营养性贫血、更年期肥胖、孕期营养、化疗提高营养、体重减轻、代谢障碍、维生素D缺乏、营养缺乏、钙缺乏、严重营养不良
更多服务
张楠楠 主治医师

妇科:各种阴道炎,痛经,盆腔炎,良恶性肿瘤诊疗。脱垂,更年期综合征等。产科:产检,产科并发症合并症,先兆流产,妊娠期糖尿病,高血压,前置胎盘等。辅助生殖:不孕不育等常见疾病。

好评 99%
接诊量 2924
平均等待 15分钟
擅长:妇科:各种阴道炎,痛经,盆腔炎,良恶性肿瘤诊疗。脱垂,更年期综合征等。产科:产检,产科并发症合并症,先兆流产,妊娠期糖尿病,高血压,前置胎盘等。辅助生殖:不孕不育等常见疾病。
更多服务
张先娟 副主任医师

擅长妇科肿瘤(如子宫肌瘤、卵巢良恶性肿瘤、子宫内膜癌、宫颈癌)、盆底功能障碍性疾病(子宫脱垂、阴道前后壁脱垂、压力下尿失禁)、妇科内分泌(多囊卵巢综合征、异常子宫出血---月经不调、子宫内膜息肉、闭经)、子宫内膜异位症(子宫腺肌病、卵巢巧克力囊肿)、妇科炎性疾病(外阴炎、阴道炎、急慢性盆腔炎)、宫颈病变(宫颈HPV感染、宫颈癌前病变)、妇科急腹症(宫外孕破裂、黄体囊肿破裂、卵巢肿瘤蒂扭转)等疾病的诊治,擅长经脐及经阴单孔腹腔镜(目前业界最先进的技术---无痕手术)、宫腔镜手术特别是阴道内镜技术、宫颈锥切手术,擅长子宫多发肌瘤及子宫腺肌病(大子宫)保留子宫手术,并将快速康复理念应用到手术患者,用最小的创伤治愈疾病,实现大子宫切除患者术后2天出院。

好评 -
接诊量 -
平均等待 -
擅长:擅长妇科肿瘤(如子宫肌瘤、卵巢良恶性肿瘤、子宫内膜癌、宫颈癌)、盆底功能障碍性疾病(子宫脱垂、阴道前后壁脱垂、压力下尿失禁)、妇科内分泌(多囊卵巢综合征、异常子宫出血---月经不调、子宫内膜息肉、闭经)、子宫内膜异位症(子宫腺肌病、卵巢巧克力囊肿)、妇科炎性疾病(外阴炎、阴道炎、急慢性盆腔炎)、宫颈病变(宫颈HPV感染、宫颈癌前病变)、妇科急腹症(宫外孕破裂、黄体囊肿破裂、卵巢肿瘤蒂扭转)等疾病的诊治,擅长经脐及经阴单孔腹腔镜(目前业界最先进的技术---无痕手术)、宫腔镜手术特别是阴道内镜技术、宫颈锥切手术,擅长子宫多发肌瘤及子宫腺肌病(大子宫)保留子宫手术,并将快速康复理念应用到手术患者,用最小的创伤治愈疾病,实现大子宫切除患者术后2天出院。
更多服务
李媛 副主任医师

致力于湿疹、痤疮、过敏性紫癜、儿童皮肤病、银屑病、白癜风、脱发、尖锐湿疣等常见皮肤性病的诊治,以及皮肤年轻化的管理。尤其擅长皮肤肿物、色素痣等美容手术及外科手术治疗。

好评 99%
接诊量 7109
平均等待 30分钟
擅长:致力于湿疹、痤疮、过敏性紫癜、儿童皮肤病、银屑病、白癜风、脱发、尖锐湿疣等常见皮肤性病的诊治,以及皮肤年轻化的管理。尤其擅长皮肤肿物、色素痣等美容手术及外科手术治疗。
更多服务
孙倩倩 副主任医师

擅长儿童呼吸系统疾病诊治

好评 99%
接诊量 2257
平均等待 15分钟
擅长:擅长儿童呼吸系统疾病诊治
更多服务

患友问诊

耳廓上出现水泡,想自行搓破治疗。
5
2024-11-01 03:36:14
耳朵里有个硬块,不红肿,怀疑是耳廓假性囊肿。患者男性6岁
37
2024-11-01 03:36:14
我发现耳朵上有一个鼓包,摸起来有点硬,会不会是耳朵肿瘤?患者男性39岁
27
2024-11-01 03:36:14
患者因耳垂肿大而就诊,曾经被诊断为粉瘤并使用药膏治疗,虽然疼痛消失但肿块依然存在并有下移趋势。
49
2024-11-01 03:36:14
耳廓假性囊肿引起皮肤水泡,疑药物刺激,需继续用药观察。患者男性6岁
57
2024-11-01 03:36:14
化脓性软骨膜炎后,脸部和脖子肿胀,耳朵疼痛且有出水,怀疑湿疹。患者女性20岁
5
2024-11-01 03:36:14
耳朵硬疙瘩,不疼不痒,捏起来有水,疑似囊肿。患者男性35岁
7
2024-11-01 03:36:14
宝宝三个月大,耳廓里有一个鼓起的硬块,像骨头一样,已经持续了三个月,想知道这是什么情况?患者男性22岁
10
2024-11-01 03:36:14
耳廓上长了一个软包,已经一周了,疼不痒,想知道可能是什么问题?患者男性32岁
58
2024-11-01 03:36:14
孩子耳朵里有一个软性小包,不发红,想知道可能的原因和处理方法。患者女性10岁
10
2024-11-01 03:36:14

科普文章

氨氯地平贝那普利片(I)治疗高血压该如何服药

佐米曲普坦的注意事项

很多男性朋友在就诊时会担心自己是否是前列腺炎,今天我们就来讲解一下前列腺炎和勃起功能障碍之间的一些关系。

勃起功能障碍(ED)和前列腺炎是男性常见的两种健康问题,它们虽然不同,但可能存在一定的联系。了解这些区别和联系对于维护男性健康至关重要。

 
一、勃起功能障碍(ED)
 
勃起功能障碍是指男性在性行为中无法获得或维持足够的勃起硬度以完成性交。这种情况可能由多种因素引起,包括心理因素和生理因素。
 
1. 心理因素:压力、焦虑、抑郁或性心理障碍都可能导致勃起功能障碍。例如,长期的心理压力和焦虑可能会影响男性的性欲和勃起能力。
 
2. 生理因素:血管问题(如动脉硬化)、神经问题、内分泌问题(如睾酮水平低下)、药物副作用、手术或创伤等也可能导致勃起功能障碍。例如,动脉硬化可能会影响血液流动,从而导致勃起困难。
 
二、前列腺炎
 
前列腺炎是前列腺的炎症,可能由感染或非感染因素引起。
 
1. 感染因素:细菌感染是引起前列腺炎的一种常见原因。细菌可能通过尿道进入前列腺,引发炎症。
 
2. 非感染因素:除了感染,前列腺炎还可能由其他非感染因素引起,如长期憋尿、久坐、饮酒过度等。这些因素可能导致前列腺充血,引发炎症。
 
三、勃起功能障碍与前列腺炎的可能联系
 
虽然勃起功能障碍和前列腺炎是两种不同的疾病,但它们之间可能存在一定的联系。前列腺炎可能导致勃起功能障碍。例如,前列腺炎可能引起会阴部或下腹部疼痛,这些疼痛和不适可能影响男性的性欲和勃起能力。此外,前列腺炎可能导致内分泌失调,如睾酮水平低下,从而影响勃起功能。
 
总之,勃起功能障碍和前列腺炎都是男性常见的健康问题,它们之间可能存在一定的联系。如果您遇到这些问题,建议及时就医,接受专业的治疗和建议。同时,保持良好的生活习惯,如适量运动、避免久坐、减少饮酒等,也有助于预防这些问题的发生。
勃起功能障碍(ED),即男性突然不能勃起的现象,是一个复杂的问题,可能由多种因素引起。这些因素可以大致分为心理原因、行为习惯、器质性伤害和药物影响四大类。
 

心理原因:心理因素是导致ED的常见原因之一。这些因素可能包括对怀孕或性传播疾病的担忧,对性行为的紧张、焦虑或恐惧,以及缺乏隐私或舒适的环境。

感情问题,如夫妻感情冷淡或审美疲劳,也可能影响男性的性功能。

此外,性知识缺乏或性经验不足也可能导致ED。

行为习惯:某些行为习惯也可能对男性的性功能产生不良影响。例如,过度自慰可能导致不应期延长,从而影响勃起功能。长时间的熬夜和久坐、酗酒和吸烟等不良生活习惯也可能引发ED。
器质性伤害:生殖器官的异常或伤害、内分泌问题(如糖尿病、甲状腺功能异常等)、神经系统病变(如脊髓损伤、多发性硬化症等)和血管问题(如动脉粥样硬化、高脂血症等)都可能导致ED。这些问题通常需要医疗干预来解决。
药物影响:某些药物可能导致ED,如抗高血压药、抗抑郁药等。在这种情况下,可能需要与医生协商调整药物方案。
 
总之,ED可能由多种因素引起,治疗ED需要综合考虑各种可能性。在面对ED时,男性应该及时寻求医疗帮助,同时注意调整自己的生活习惯和心理状态。

病症: 胃癌 恶性黑色素瘤

患者:李女士

年龄:70岁

罹患癌症,毫无疑问对每个人都是重大打击。而如果一位患者不幸同时罹患两种癌症,我们可以想象得出他的心情会是怎样的沉重。

但时至今日,癌症早已不再是什么“不治之症”,很多良好的治疗方法,可帮助患者迈过重重困境,预后得到极大提升。

不仅如此,在医疗全球化的今天,中国患者也能通过“海外二诊”服务,快速触达到国际权威专家资源,为自己的治疗保驾护航!

今天的案例主人公李女士,正是一位“海外二诊”的受益者。我们来一起看看她的故事。*为保护隐私,文中患者个人信息均已经脱敏处理。

70岁的李女士在去年年底,因脚底疼痛去医院看病,结果发现脚后跟有一个1厘米的黑色肿物。医生判断是冻疮,于是开了点外用药,李女士也就没有再放在心上。

大概4个月后,真正的噩梦降临:李女士通过影像检查,被诊断为胃癌,而且有了淋巴结转移。 她还出现了多次呕血,病情非常危急。很快,医生为她实施了全胃切除。令人意想不到的是,几天后通过检查,医生发现李女士后脚跟的肿物竟然也是癌症——恶性黑色素瘤。于是大概2个月后,医生又切除了她的足底肿瘤。 

为了降低复发风险,李女士开始了3个周期的化疗联合免疫治疗(替吉奥联合纳武单抗)。

虽然该做的都已做完,但对于李女士来说,恐惧感还远未被消除。因为癌症最令人恐惧的,是其具有“复发转移”的能力 。一旦癌症再次袭来,李女士不知道自己该如何应对。另外,两种癌症的治疗以及术后辅助药物治疗,也让李女士遭遇了一些副作用。比如腹泻、味觉障碍还有体重明显下降的问题。这些对于已经70岁的李女士来说,都很影响生活质量,所以迫切需要解决。

在本次的国际专家“海外二诊”服务中,李女士预约的是来自日本某知名综合性医院肿瘤中心的外科部长医生,他的专长领域既包括肿瘤外科,又包括各类癌症药物疗法、姑息治疗,是一位“内外兼修”的权威专家。在充分了解了李女士既往的病情和治疗经过后,医生很快通过远程会诊的方式,为患者详细解答了当前她的所有问题。

1、 未来如果转移或复发了该怎么办?  

医生:假如您未来不幸出现转移或复发,那么化疗是核心治疗手段。对于单发的孤立转移灶,可以选择手术、放疗来进行局部治疗。

具体化疗方案选择,我按使用的先后顺序列出了3类,当前面的方案失效后,可更换为后面的方案。

一类方案:化疗联合/不联合免疫方案  

  • CAPOX (卡培他滨+奥沙利铂)±O药(即免疫药物纳武单抗)
  • SOX (替吉奥+奥沙利铂)±O药
  • FOLFOX (5-FU+奥沙利铂)±O药

二类方案:化疗联合/不联合抗血管药物方案  

  • Taxane (紫杉醇/白蛋白结合型紫杉醇/多西紫杉醇)±雷莫芦单抗

三类方案:化疗方案  

  • 曲氟尿苷/盐酸替吡嘧啶
  • 伊立替康

  2、N K细胞疗法是否对我有帮助?副作用是否可控?   X医生:目前尚没有证据表明NK细胞疗法对癌症有效,因此不予推荐。

3、口服替吉奥会腹泻,是否需要调整方案?   II/III期胃癌患者术后采用辅助治疗方案,分别为:

  • 替吉奥口服 1 年(口服 4 周,停药 2 周,共 8 个疗程或口服 2 周,停药 1 周,共 16个疗程)
  • CAPOX (卡培他滨+奥沙利铂) 共半年(每 3 周一次,共 8 个疗程)
  • SOX (替吉奥+奥沙利铂) 共半年(每 3 周一次,共 8 个疗程)

这三种方案中,替吉奥方案和CAPOX方案等效,但SOX要优于替吉奥。另外,胃癌术后直接使用纳武单抗免疫治疗无意义。

替吉奥确实会出现腹泻等代表性不良反应,患者可以考虑对症治疗,比如调节肠道的药物、止泻药等缓解副作用。如果副作用太严重,那么可以考虑减少药物剂量。

替吉奥的标准用药剂量为120mg,但用量低于80mg无法达到预期效果。如果当前患者用药为100mg,那么为了降低副作用,可以减少剂量到80mg;但如果目前剂量已经是80mg,则无法进一步降低剂量,此时考虑更换方案为CAPOX方案替代。 如果不良反应严重到干扰日常生活,则患者可以选择停药,持续观察病情变化。

对于无淋巴结转移的II期B和II其C的患者,可选择使用1年帕博丽珠单抗免疫治疗。

4 、术后患者很瘦,味觉障碍,如何调理改善?   通常,手术后患者体重会减轻20%左右。这是患者消化吸收能力低下、促食欲的胃肠激素减少引起的。大约6个月到1年时间,患者可以恢复正常。

味觉障碍可能是抗癌药的副作用引起的,也可能是饮食减少导致缺乏锌等微量元素引起的。建议患者采用少食多餐的方式饮食,每天分5-6次吃饭。在日本,我们有时也会给患者用一些营养补充剂。

另外,也可以考虑采用中草药的对症治疗,改善症状,比如十全大补汤、六君子汤。 会诊结束后,李女士的心情得到了极大的平复。她对自己未来要走的路更清晰了,也对日本专家的细致指导和会诊的快速响应非常满意。

中国是消化道癌症发病数量较多的国家,根据国家癌症中心发布的《2022年中国恶性肿瘤疾病负担情况》数据,2022年我国胃癌新发病例约为35.87万例,死亡人数26.04万人。

总体来说,胃癌属于严重威胁我国国民生命健康的蕞常见癌症之一。胃癌如能在早、中期发现,还是有很大机会通过手术实现根治的,患者仍有一定机会得到临床治愈(术后5年不复发即为临床治愈)。

但在胃癌患者中,一部分人会因为【年龄较高】、伴有诸多【基础病】等问题,对手术存有疑虑,担心“下不来手术台”,甚至会放弃手术机会,选择吃药等姑息治疗。这样的选择真的正确吗?现如今的技术能否支持这类老年患者安全手术呢?接下来,我们一起看一个真实案例。

01七旬老人遭遇中期胃癌

一位七十多岁的“老胃病”项女士,因短时间体重骤降(8斤)前往就医。血液检测显示,她有一项指标异常升高。进一步检查发现,她的食道和胃连接的地方(贲门)以及胃的“外墙”(胃壁)都变得异常的厚,而且形状不均匀——这正是胃癌常见的表现。

医生随后通过胃镜检查和病例活检(取一小块组织观察上面的细胞),确诊了老人患有胃癌。由于还没有出现胃以外的远处其他器官的转移,也没有附近淋巴结转移,因此项女士的胃癌分期为中期。虽不是早期,但中期胃癌通常是可以手术的。为项女士提供诊疗的医生也表示,可以通过全胃切除手术实现根治。

但一来项女士已经七十多岁,二来她有20多年的糖尿病(手术伤口会更慢愈合、感染风险高、术后并发症风险高)、右肺还有一枚1.2厘米的肺结节。种种问题让老人和家人们都比较犹豫,担心扛不住治疗,最终“越治越糟”。在这样的背景下,项女士决定找一位足够权威的外科专家,来为自己进行全面评估,看看能不能兼顾好肿瘤根治以及手术的安全性。

不久后,项女士预约了来自日本癌研有明医院消化中心胃外科部长布部创也医生为自己提供指导。

02日本专家咨询内容分享

在充分了解了项女士的病情信息和全部资料后,布部创也医生给出了如下指导建议:首先,患者此前接受的是普通CT而非增强CT,胃镜也没有清晰展示食道上肿瘤具体侵犯的程度,因此很难得出精准的分期判断。

后面患者来癌研有明医院就医时,医疗团队会在治疗前为她做一套非常精细、全面的检查,此后就可以明确肿瘤情况了。届时如果发现患者的分期、肿瘤侵犯的范围确实和现在的结果相同,那么可以通过一个腹腔镜微创手术实现根治,损伤会非常小;如果届时发现肿瘤侵犯食道过多,则需要消化道联合食道外科共同进行胸腔镜手术治疗。

但无论是哪一种情况,患者都可以耐受手术,并且保留一部分胃。癌研有明医院是一家极为擅长肿瘤微创手术的知名癌症专科医院。在胃癌方面,2005年,医院开始导入腹腔镜,2019年又引入了达芬奇手术机器人,患者术后并发症更少了。如今,癌研有明医院98%的外科手术都采用微创。

受益于此,很多在别的医院需要胃全切的胃癌患者,到癌研有明后可以保留一部分胃,还能兼顾临床治愈。这对于术后患者的长期营养摄入和体重维持都很有帮助。布部创也医生所在科室的主要目标之一,正是在做到根治性切除的前提之下,将原本的胃全切术式变为次全胃切除术,尽可能为患者保留一些胃,让他们未来的生活质量得到提升。

那么项女士的糖尿病问题,会不会影响到手术呢?对此,布部创也医生认为完全不必担心,因为对于这类患者,癌研有明医院会进行详细的术前评估,并且有专业团队介入,从生活方式调整和专业治疗入手,帮助患者控制好血糖,让血糖水平达到符合手术的标准,从而降低术后愈合不良风险。

关于肺部的1.2厘米结节,布部医生认为可以暂不处理,无论它到底是良性还是恶性。因为这枚结节属于纯磨玻璃结节,即便是恶性,进展也非常缓慢,并不会快速出现转移扩散。而胃癌根治手术虽然会采用微创方式,但依然会给患者带来一定的负担,如果同时处理肺结节,会导致负担过重、患者难以承受。所以当前蕞好的处理办法,是先集中精力解决胃癌肿瘤,术后安排呼吸科专家为患者进行肺结节诊断,给出随访或手术或根治性放疗的建议。

03项女士术后,是否需要化疗来降低复发风险、争取更大治愈希望?

对此,布部创也医生表示,是否化疗现在还不能判断。因为术后患者能获得蕞精准的分期判断,有可能患者术前被认为是2期,但实际上术后成了1期(无需化疗);有时也可能患者术前是1期,但术后成了2-3期。假如是2-3期,则患者术后需要坚持1年的辅助化疗,大概可以降低10%的复发风险。

当地时间10月29日礼来宣布了Ⅲb期临床试验(TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 6)的积极结果,对于早期症状性阿尔茨海默病成人患者,用改良滴定方案接受donanemab治疗的患者在24周主要终点时,伴水肿/积液的淀粉样蛋白相关影像学异常(ARIA-E)有所减少。

donanemab这个新药在今年7月获批于美国,又在之后获日本厚生劳动省、英国药品和医疗产品监管局批准,用于轻度阿尔茨海默病、轻度认知功能障碍的治疗。donanemab在国内2023年取得突破性治疗药物认定,并纳入优先审评审批程序,目前还在审评审批过程中。

CDE官网截图

但在FDA说明书中有黑框警告,大意是应用该药时应注意淀粉样蛋白相关影像学异常(ARIA),表现为ARIA-E和ARIA伴含铁血黄素沉积(ARIA-H),通常发生在治疗早期,且无症状,很少发生严重和危及生命的事件。本次试验的积极结果和这个黑框警告相关。一起来看详情。

FDA说明书截图

给药方式有哪些改变?会不会影响效果?

TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 6是一项多中心随机双盲Ⅲb期研究,主要研究donanemab的不同给药方案对早期症状性AD患者ARIA-E和淀粉样蛋白清除率的影响,这里的早期AD指的是轻度认知障碍(MCI)和轻度痴呆疾病阶段。

给药方式和既往不同,既往标准给药方案是在前三次输注时接受2瓶(700mg)donanemab,然后再接受4瓶(1400mg);改良滴定方式是患者第一次输注1瓶(350mg),第二次输注2瓶(700mg),第三次输注3瓶(1050mg),此后每次输注4瓶(1400mg)。

研究的主要终点是第24周时患者出现ARIA-E占总参与者的比例,结果显示接受改良滴定方式的患者ARIA-E发生率为14%,而标准给药方案为24%,相对风险降低41%。载脂蛋白E(APOE)是已知的阿尔茨海默病遗传风险因素的携带者,在这些患者中,19%患者在改良滴定时患有ARIA-E,而标准给药方案中为57%,相对风险降低67%。

看到这里你或许也有疑问,虽然ARIA-E的发生风险降低了,但改良滴定方案会不会影响疗效?答案是不会。

与接受标准给药方案的患者相比,改良滴定患者淀粉样斑块和p-tau217减少。改良滴定的患者的淀粉样斑块水平较基线平均降低 67%,而标准给药组患者为69%。

参考来源

1.Modified Titration of Donanemab Demonstrated Reduction of ARIA-E in Early Symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease Patients in Phase Ⅲb study.

2.CED官网.

3.A Study of Different Donanemab (LY3002813) Dosing Regimens in Adults With Early Alzheimer's Disease (TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 6).

当地时间10月29日,阿西米尼(asciminib)获美国食品药品管理局(FDA)加速批准[1] ,用于慢性期新诊断的费城染色体阳性慢性粒细胞白血病(Ph+CML)成年患者。CML是一种骨髓和血细胞癌症,通常由费城染色体的异常染色体引起。在一线治疗中,约1/3的患者会出现下列问题:由于不良反应或者治疗无效而停止酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)治疗。

为了解决这一问题,需要开发新的药物,asciminib就是解决这一困境的新药。早在2022年8月,加拿大药物和卫生技术局(CADTH)建议[2] :“若满足条件,可通过公共药物计划报销asciminib用于治疗费城染色体阳性慢性粒细胞白血病。”

asciminib为何得到FDA的青睐?

本次获批基于一项III期多中心随机研究,研究目的是比较每日80mg的asciminib与TKI治疗的疗效。TKI治疗是接受伊马替尼、尼洛替尼、达沙替尼或博舒替尼任意一种治疗。

共有405名患者被随机分配(1:1)进两组治疗。主要疗效结局指标是48周时的主要分子反应(MMR)率。这个指标是慢性髓性白血病的关键指标,这个比例越高,说明该治疗在基因水平上对疾病的控制效果越好,能够更有效地抑制疾病相关基因的表达,进而有望更好地控制疾病的进展、改善患者的症状和预后。

研究结果显示,48周时MMR率方面,asciminib组中为68%(95% CI: 61, 74),TKI组为49%(95% CI: 42, 56),二者相差19%。细看具体的TKI,入组伊马替尼和其他TKI药物入组比例为1:1;asciminib组的MMR率为69%(95% CI: 59, 78),而伊马替尼组为40%(95% CI: 31, 50),相差近30%(95% CI: 17, 42)。

这个新药安全吗?每周需要打几次药?

根据FDA数据显示,在新诊断和既往接受过治疗的患者,应用新药最常见的不良反应(≥20%)是肌肉骨骼疼痛、皮疹、疲劳、上呼吸道感染、头痛、腹痛和腹泻。若只看新诊断的患者,最常见的实验室异常(≥40%)是淋巴细胞计数降低、白细胞计数降低、血小板计数降低、中性粒细胞计数降低等。

根据FDA已批准的asciminib说明书,用药期间还需要注意一下事项:

1.骨髓抑制 :用药期间可能因出现骨髓抑制,发生血小板减少症、中性粒细胞减少症和贫血。用药应在治疗的前3个月,需要每两周进行一次全血细胞计数,此后每月进行一次检测,从而判断患者有无骨髓抑制症状。根据严重程度,咨询医生是否需要停药。

2.胰腺毒性 :患者可能出现血清脂肪酶和淀粉酶无症状升高,每月需评估血清脂肪酶和淀粉酶水平,如果您有胰腺炎,则注意主动告知医生,需要进行频率更高的检测。

3.高血压风险 :可能出现3级或4级高血压风险,应注意检测血压。

4.超敏反应 :可能出现3级或4级超敏反应,包括皮疹、水肿和支气管痉挛。如果出现这些症状,需及时反馈医生,医生会根据超敏反应的体征和症状,开始适当的治疗。

5.心血管毒性 :如果您有心血管病史,需要告知医生;对于3级或更高级别的心血管毒性,医生会考虑暂停用药、减少剂量或永久停药。

6.胚胎/胎儿毒性 :若您在怀孕期间用药或在服用药物期间怀孕,可能对孩子有潜在风险。这个新药是口服药,需要根据不同的给药剂量(80mg或40mg)每天/或每两天用药。

近些年来,还有哪些白血病药物获批FDA?

根据FDA肿瘤学/血液系统恶性肿瘤批准通知,白血病相关新药整理如下表。

另外可以看出21年时asciminib已获批白血病治疗,但限定既往接受过两种或更多TKIs治疗,本次获批属于扩大适应证。

参考来源:

1.FDA grants accelerated approval to asciminib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. 2.Asciminib(Scemblix):CADTHReimbursementRecommendation:Indication:ForthetreatmentofadultpatientswithPhiladelphiachromosome-positivechronicmyeloidleukemia(Ph+CML)inchronicphase(CP)previouslytreatedwith2ormoretyrosinekinaseinhibitors.Ottawa(ON):CanadianAgencyforDrugsandTechnologiesinHealth;2022Aug.PMID:38713779. 3.AStudyofOralAsciminibVersusOtherTKIsinAdultPatientsWithNewlyDiagnosedPh+CML-CP. 4.Product information:SCEMBLIX-asciminibtablet,filmcoated.UpdatedAugust7,2024. 5.Oncology(Cancer)/HematologicMalignanciesApprovalNotifications.

除了骤降的气温

接下来上场的

是各个呼吸道疾病

他们会在你没换上秋裤的某一个夜晚悄悄潜入

流感

就是其中之一

  • 什么是流感

流行性感冒,简称流感,是由流感病毒引起的急性呼吸道传染病。流感病毒分为甲、乙、丙三型,能够引起爆发流行的主要是甲型、乙型。 易感人群: 流感病毒对于所有人群都普遍易感,但儿童更容易感染流感等呼吸道传染病,主要与接触机会有关。

  • 流感的主要症状

全身症状明显,如高热、头痛、咽痛、咳嗽、鼻塞、流涕、全身酸痛、寒颤、乏力、食欲减退等。肺炎是流感最常见的并发症之一,会出现咳嗽、胸痛、咳痰、发热、呼吸困难等,严重者出现呼吸衰竭。

  • 中招流感怎么治疗

流感治疗主要是对症治疗和对因治疗两部分。

对症治疗:流涕、发烧、疼痛的时候给予抗过敏,减少充血,以及退热止痛的药物治疗。咳嗽咳痰严重者可服用止咳祛痰药物。

对因治疗:对于 儿童 ,应该尽早的开始抗流感病毒的药物治疗,奥司他韦等神经氨酸酶抑制剂是流感的有效治疗药物,早期尤其是发病 48 小时之内应用抗流感病毒药物,能显著降低流感重症和死亡的发生率。即便超过48小时以上,抗病毒治疗仍是有效的治疗措施。

提示:本内容仅作参考,不能代替面诊(文中所提及药品,必须在专业医生的指导下使用),如有不适请尽快线下

以下内容来源于新英格兰医学杂志。

Presentation of Case

Dr. Carrie Chui (Neurology): A 79-year-old man was admitted to this hospital because of involuntary movements on the left side and transient unresponsiveness.
The patient had been in his usual state of health until 9 months before admission, when involuntary movements of the left shoulder and left side of the face developed. The movements were described by the patient as twitching, were not associated with a change in the level of consciousness, and resolved after 1 to 2 minutes. During the next 6 months, the patient had similar episodes approximately once per month, but the episodes increased in duration, lasting 5 to 6 minutes.
Three months before admission, the episodes of involuntary movements increased in frequency, and the patient was evaluated by his primary care physician. The physical examination was normal. Results of kidney-function tests were normal, as were blood levels of glucose and electrolytes, except for the sodium level, which was 129 mmol per liter (reference range, 135 to 145). There was a history of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion, and the sodium level was similar to levels obtained during the past 4 years. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the head (Figure 1A), performed before and after the administration of intravenous contrast material, revealed a focus of enhancement in the right middle frontal gyrus that was thought to be a small vascular anomaly. Electroencephalography (EEG), performed with the patient in awake and drowsy states, revealed rare, brief, focal slowing in the left temporal lobe during drowsiness; no epileptiform abnormalities were present.
Figure 1
MRI of the Head and CT Angiogram of the Head and Neck.
Two months before admission, the patient was evaluated in the epilepsy clinic affiliated with this hospital. He reported that the episodes of involuntary movements had increased in both frequency and duration, occurring once or twice per day and lasting approximately 10 minutes. Episodes began with tingling and numbness in the left leg that prompted the patient to voluntarily stomp the left foot to relieve the uncomfortable sensation. Then, the patient had involuntary movements that he described as an uncontrollable invisible force moving the left leg and arm, with hyperextension of the arm backward and pronation of the wrist. There was associated numbness in the distal portions of the left third, fourth, and fifth fingers and involuntary movement of the left cheek. No prodromal symptoms occurred. The patient had awareness during the episodes, and after the episodes, he felt fatigued but had a normal level of consciousness, without confusion. The examination in the epilepsy clinic was normal. A diagnosis of seizure disorder was considered, and treatment with levetiracetam was started.
Three weeks before admission, the patient was again evaluated in the epilepsy clinic. He reported that the episodes of involuntary movements still occurred on a daily basis but had decreased in duration and involved only the left leg, without abnormal movements of the arm or face. Dizziness, headache, and weakness had developed and were attributed to the use of levetiracetam. The patient’s family had recorded a video of one of the episodes of involuntary movements. After reviewing the video, the patient’s neurologist thought that the episodes were less likely to be caused by seizures and more consistent with choreoathetoid movements. Cross-tapering of medications — with the simultaneous administration of levetiracetam in decreasing doses and clobazam in increasing doses — was initiated, and the patient was referred to the movement disorders clinic affiliated with this hospital.
On the morning of admission, an episode of involuntary movements of the left leg and left shoulder occurred and persisted for 1 hour. Several hours after the symptoms abated, the patient’s wife found the patient to be unresponsive; he was sitting in a chair. Emergency medical services were called, and when they arrived, the patient was responsive. The fingerstick blood glucose level was 180 mg per deciliter (10.0 mmol per liter) and the blood pressure 110/80 mm Hg. The patient was transported to the emergency department of this hospital for further evaluation.
In the emergency department, the patient reported dysuria and increased urinary frequency. The patient’s daughter noted that he had been more anxious during the past 3 years and occasionally had trouble with memory. Other medical history included Barrett’s esophagus, benign prostatic hypertrophy, chronic hepatitis B virus infection, eczema, gastroesophageal reflux disease, hypertension, nonischemic cardiomyopathy, and osteoporosis. There was no history of head trauma or extended loss of consciousness. Medications included aspirin, atorvastatin, doxazosin, finasteride, omeprazole, metoprolol, sacubitril, and valsartan. There were no known drug allergies. The patient was a lifelong nonsmoker and drank alcohol rarely; he did not use illicit drugs. His mother had had gastric cancer, and his sister had had esophageal cancer; there was no family history of seizures.
On examination, the temporal temperature was 36.8°C, the blood pressure 152/97 mm Hg, the pulse 65 beats per minute, the respiratory rate 16 breaths per minute, and the oxygen saturation 96% while the patient was breathing ambient air. The body-mass index (the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) was 21.7. The blood pressure decreased to 130/63 mm Hg with standing. The patient was alert and interactive. The lower jaw was held to the left, but the nasolabial folds and smile were symmetric with activation. There were nonrhythmic, nonstereotyped, writhing movements of the left arm. Tone was normal, and strength was assessed as 5 out of 5 in the arms and legs. Results of liver-function and kidney-function tests were normal, as were blood levels of glucose and electrolytes, except for the sodium level, which was 125 mmol per liter. The lactate level was 2.1 mmol per liter (19 mg per deciliter; reference range, 0.5 to 2.0 mmol per liter [5 to 18 mg per deciliter]). The urinalysis was normal. Intravenous fluids were administered. Imaging studies were obtained.
Dr. Rajiv Gupta: Computed tomographic (CT) angiography of the head and neck (Figure 1B) revealed extensively calcified plaque with severe stenosis of the distal right common carotid artery (CCA), extending into the proximal right internal carotid artery (ICA), as well as stenosis of the right and left paraclinoid ICAs and the left vertebral artery at its origin. There was no vascular abnormality on the CT angiogram that corresponded to the abnormality in the right middle frontal gyrus seen on the previous MRI.
Dr. Chui: The patient was admitted to the hospital. On the second hospital day, the sodium level had increased to 130 mmol per liter, and the lactate level was normal. Additional imaging studies were obtained.
Dr. Gupta: MRI of the head showed no evidence of acute infarction. The focus of enhancement in the right frontal lobe that had been noted previously was not seen on the current MRI.
Dr. Chui: Blood levels of thyrotropin, cobalamin, and glycated hemoglobin and results of coagulation tests were normal. Screening tests for Lyme disease, tuberculosis, and syphilis were negative, as were tests for antibodies to cardiolipin and β2-glycoprotein. A test for antinuclear antibodies was positive, at a titer of 1:160 in a homogeneous pattern. During a physical therapy session, the patient had abnormal movements of the left leg, left arm, and left side of the face. The abnormal movements diminished when the patient used distraction techniques, such as thigh tapping, finger snapping, and walking while holding a glass of water.
The transient unresponsiveness that led to the patient’s admission was attributed to a combination of sedation from clobazam and hypovolemia. Treatment with clobazam was stopped, and hydration was encouraged. A diagnosis of functional neurologic disorder was considered; outpatient physical therapy with continued use of distraction techniques was recommended. The patient was discharged home on the third hospital day.
Episodes of involuntary movements continued to occur on a daily basis at home. Two weeks after discharge, when the patient was doing exercises while sitting in a chair and having a conversation with his wife, he suddenly stopped talking. She found him slumped in the chair with his eyes closed, no longer exercising. When she asked him questions, he repeatedly said “yes.” Emergency medical services were called, and when they arrived, the patient was alert, diaphoretic, and nonverbal. He had a facial droop on the left side and a right gaze preference. The fingerstick blood glucose level was 130 mg per deciliter (7.2 mmol per liter) and the blood pressure 120/60 mm Hg. The patient was transported to the emergency department of this hospital for further evaluation.
In the emergency department, the temporal temperature was 36.6°C, the blood pressure 143/63 mm Hg, the pulse 66 beats per minute, the respiratory rate 18 breaths per minute, and the oxygen saturation 98% while the patient was breathing ambient air. He was alert and interactive. There was a facial droop on the left side. There was no effort against gravity in the left arm. The patient was able to lift the left leg off the bed for 1 to 2 seconds. He had a right gaze deviation that could not be overcome and mild dysarthria. The remainder of the examination was normal. A diagnosis of stroke was considered, and emergency CT angiography was performed.
Dr. Gupta: CT angiography showed no evidence of acute territorial infarction and no changes in cerebrovascular disease.
Dr. Chui: On repeat physical examination performed after CT angiography, the gaze deviation and dysarthria had resolved, and strength was normal. Mild facial paralysis was present.
A diagnosis was made.

Differential Diagnosis

Dr. Albert Y. Hung: This 79-year-old man initially presented with involuntary movements of the left shoulder and face without associated loss of consciousness. Diagnosis of an unusual movement disorder, especially one that is present episodically, can be challenging. Videos brought in by the patient can be very useful. 1 Most movement disorders result from abnormal functioning of extrapyramidal circuits involving the basal ganglia, rather than a specific neuroanatomical lesion, and the first step toward diagnosis is to identify the type of abnormal movements. 2
Four salient aspects of this patient’s involuntary movements can help in characterizing the movement disorder before generating a differential diagnosis. First, the movements were paroxysmal, lasting for short periods of time with resolution between episodes. Second, the movements were nonstereotyped, appearing randomly and variably. Third, the movements were restricted to the left side of his body throughout the course, localizing the disease process to the right cerebral hemisphere. Finally, the symptoms were progressive, increasing in both duration and frequency.

Movement Disorders

This patient had abnormal involuntary movements, symptoms indicative of a hyperkinetic movement disorder. Tremor, the most common hyperkinetic disorder, is unlikely because the patient did not have rhythmic movements. Dystonia is also unlikely, because he did not have sustained muscle contractions that were causing twisting or abnormal postures of the legs, arms, head, neck, or face. Although the patient initially described the movements as twitching, his later descriptions are not suggestive of myoclonus or tics, which manifest as sudden, rapid, recurrent movements.
This patient’s neurologist described the involuntary movements as “choreoathetoid” after reviewing a video of an episode. Chorea, athetosis, and ballism make up a spectrum of involuntary movements that often occur in combination. Chorea refers to involuntary movements that are “dancelike” — irregular, random, unintended, and flowing from one body part to another. When these movements are slow and writhing (with a lower amplitude) and involve the distal limbs, the term athetosis is used. The presence of both chorea and athetosis in the same patient is referred to as choreoathetosis. When the movements are fast and flinging (with a higher amplitude) and involve the proximal limbs, the term ballism is used. Although the description of this patient’s movements was not clearly suggestive of ballism, hemichorea and hemiballismus often occur together.
The term dyskinesia can refer to any abnormal movements and is often used to describe hyperkinetic disorders that are induced by specific drugs, such as tardive dyskinesia induced by dopamine antagonists or dyskinesia induced by levodopa in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Often, dyskinesia manifests as chorea or choreoathetoid movements, but chorea and dyskinesia are not synonymous. This patient appears to have involuntary dyskinesia with choreoathetosis as the primary phenomenology. Before constructing a differential diagnosis for dyskinesia in this patient, I will consider two conditions that mimic dyskinesia: seizures and functional movement disorder.

Seizures

Various movement disorders may be mistaken for seizures, although these movement disorders are not associated with EEG abnormalities during the episode. Patients with some forms of epilepsy may present with abnormal movements without other features that are typically associated with seizures, such as aura, change in responsiveness, incontinence, or a postictal state. 3,4 Seizures were initially suspected in this patient, and he was referred to the epilepsy clinic. Recurrent focal seizures were probably suspected because of the transient nature of the episodes. Initial MRI had shown a small abnormality in the right middle frontal gyrus, but this finding was not seen on follow-up imaging, which makes it unlikely to be related to the overall presentation. Baseline EEG had shown only brief left temporal slowing, without epileptiform abnormalities. The EEG was an interictal study, so the findings do not rule out seizures. However, the slowing was ipsilateral to the abnormal movements, so it is unlikely to be related to the episodes. In addition, the patient’s involuntary movements were nonstereotyped and nonrhythmic, which makes his presentation unlikely to be due to a seizure disorder.

Functional Movement Disorder

Because this patient’s movements diminished with the use of distraction techniques, a diagnosis of functional movement disorder was considered. Most cases of functional movement disorder begin abruptly after a trigger, such as a mild physical injury or illness; a psychological stressor can be present but is not required for diagnosis. Symptoms are typically most severe around the time of onset and may wax and wane over time. Although distractibility is a finding associated with functional disorders, abnormal movements that occur with nonfunctional syndromes can sometimes be suppressed by action or incorporated into voluntary movements in a manner that may appear distractible. Several clinical features in this patient make a diagnosis of functional disorder unlikely. Functional movement disorder is more common in women than in men, and the average age at onset is 40 years. 5 In addition, tremor is the most common clinical phenotype seen in patients with functional movement disorder; chorea or choreoathetosis, which was seen in this patient, is very unusual in patients with functional movement disorder. Overall, functional movement disorder is unlikely to explain this patient’s presentation.

Dyskinesia

Primary paroxysmal dyskinesia refers to a group of heterogeneous syndromes characterized by recurrent involuntary movements that occur episodically and abruptly, without loss of consciousness. 6 These disorders usually begin in childhood or young adulthood. Both the age of this patient and the described phenomenology make a diagnosis of primary paroxysmal dyskinesia unlikely.
The differential diagnosis in this case is therefore focused on causes of secondary dyskinesia, of which there are many. 7 MRI ruled out the presence of a mass lesion suggestive of cancer. The patient had no history of acute illness suggestive of a viral or other infectious encephalitis, and there was no history of trauma or exposure to drugs or other toxins. Although his daughter mentioned trouble with memory, there was no compelling history suggestive of a neurodegenerative disease.
A common metabolic cause of secondary dyskinesia is diabetic striatopathy, a syndrome involving the acute-to-subacute onset of chorea and ballism in the context of hyperglycemia. 8 This syndrome can occur as the initial manifestation of type 2 diabetes mellitus or as a complication of poorly controlled diabetes. Diabetic striatopathy is more likely to develop in women than in men, and the average age at onset is 70 years. Most patients present with hemichorea and hemiballismus, rather than bilateral symptoms. CT shows hyperdensity, and T1-weighted MRI shows hyperintensity, in the contralateral basal ganglia. However, this patient had no history of diabetes and had a normal blood glycated hemoglobin level, features that rule out a diagnosis of diabetic striatopathy.
Choreiform movements can also be a manifestation of autoimmune conditions. 9 This patient’s initial presentation with unilateral shoulder and face movements would have suggested the possibility of faciobrachial dystonic seizures associated with anti–leucine-rich, glioma-inactivated 1 (anti-LGI1) encephalitis. 10 This condition is often associated with hyponatremia, which was present in this patient. However, as the case evolved, leg involvement and sensory changes developed that would be atypical for anti-LGI1 encephalitis.
One key clue in this case is that the patient did not have an isolated movement disorder. In addition to motor symptoms, he had a variety of sensory symptoms involving both the left arm and the left leg. His first hospital admission was precipitated by an episode of unresponsiveness. The clinical event that led to his second presentation to the emergency department was distinctly different: an acute onset of speech difficulty accompanied by left hemiparesis and right gaze deviation that was worrisome for an acute right middle cerebral artery (MCA) syndrome. The symptoms resolved without intervention, which indicates that he may have had an acute transient ischemic attack (TIA). The most relevant imaging finding was severe cerebrovascular disease, including severe stenosis of the distal right CCA and proximal right ICA. Could this patient’s movement disorder be explained by a vascular lesion?

Limb-Shaking TIAs

Limb-shaking TIAs were first described by C. Miller Fisher in 1962. 11 In most case reports, these episodes are associated with high-grade stenosis of the ICA, which was seen in this patient. 12,13 The mechanism is thought to be cerebral hypoperfusion, and changes in posture or head position that decrease cerebral blood flow can precipitate these episodes. In this patient, the first episode of unresponsiveness that led to hospital admission occurred when he was sitting. He then had an acute episode involving right gaze preference that was provoked by exercise and was very suggestive of a TIA in the right MCA territory. These findings are highly suggestive of a diagnosis of limb-shaking TIAs, and I would refer this patient for emergency carotid endarterectomy.

Clinical Impression and Initial Management

Dr. Scott B. Silverman: When I evaluated this patient, his transient right gaze preference and left hemiparesis were consistent with a right MCA syndrome due to a TIA from symptomatic severe stenosis of the right ICA. The mechanism of this event was either artery-to-artery embolism or hypoperfusion. His previous, recurrent episodes of transient choreoathetosis on the left side that had occurred mainly while he was sitting, standing, or exercising were consistent with limb-shaking TIAs from hypoperfusion or low flow.
The pathogenesis of a low-flow state related to severe carotid stenosis resulting in limb-shaking TIAs is described in a small case series. 14 In six out of eight patients, the transient, stereotyped, involuntary movements were eliminated with carotid artery revascularization. Positional cerebral ischemia in patients without orthostatic hypotension has been described. 15
Treatment with atorvastatin was continued, the dose of aspirin was increased to 325 mg per day, and an intravenous heparin infusion was started. The strategy of permissive hypertension was used, with high blood pressure allowed to a maximum systolic blood pressure of 180 mm Hg. The patient was admitted to the stroke service, and carotid artery duplex ultrasonography was performed.
Dr. Gupta: Doppler ultrasonography of the carotid arteries (Figure 2) revealed markedly elevated Doppler flow velocities within the proximal right ICA. There was a parvus et tardus waveform in the distal right ICA, a finding indicative of low flow related to the more proximal high-grade stenosis. The Doppler waveform contours had poststenotic turbulence.
Figure 2
Doppler Ultrasound Image.
Dr. Silverman: The vascular surgery service was consulted, and the patient underwent right carotid endarterectomy.

Clinical Diagnosis

Limb-shaking transient ischemic attacks.

Dr. Albert Y. Hung’s Diagnosis

Limb-shaking transient ischemic attacks due to severe carotid stenosis, with secondary paroxysmal dyskinesia.

Pathological Discussion

Dr. Caroline F. Hilburn: The endarterectomy specimen included the carotid bifurcation and was notable for firm arterial walls, a finding consistent with calcification. On gross examination (Figure 3A), a large plaque was centered at the carotid bifurcation and protruded into the lumen, resulting in a maximal luminal stenosis of 80%. The plaque had an irregular and focally friable surface. On microscopic examination (Figure 3B), the plaque was characterized by extensive calcification. Some regions of the plaque had a smooth, healed fibrous cap, whereas other regions had an irregular surface suggestive of ulceration, which indicated potential sites of plaque rupture. Multiple smaller calcified plaques were present, affecting both branches of the artery.
Figure 3
Endarterectomy Specimen.

Pathological Diagnosis

Complex atherosclerotic plaque with portions of attached media.

Additional Management

Dr. Silverman: After the procedure, the patient had an uneventful recovery and was discharged home on the fifth hospital day. He was seen 1 month after discharge in the stroke prevention clinic. There had been no further episodes of involuntary movements or choreoathetosis and no stroke or TIA. The patient continues to take aspirin, atorvastatin, and antihypertensive medications.

Final Diagnosis

Limb-shaking transient ischemic attacks.
药品使用说明
打开京东APP
实惠又轻松
打开京东APP
京ICP备11041704号
京公网安备 11000002000088号