京东健康互联网医院
网站导航

东直门医院,北京东直门医院,东直门中医院松果体恶性肿瘤专家

简介:

东直门医院创办于1958年,是国家“211工程”、“985工程优势学科创新平台”、国家“双一流”建设高校北京中医药大学第一临床医学院,是首批国家大型综合性三级甲等中医医院和国家示范中医医院,是首批国家中医临床研究基地和国家药物临床试验机构,是世界卫生组织中医适宜技术项目培训基地和国家级中医学实验教学示范中心,是首批国家医学中心(中医辅导类)和国家中医药传承创新中心。面向新时代,医院创造性构建了“两区一部”战略布局,东城院区位于海运仓5号,通州院区位于翠屏西路116号,国际部位于东四北大街279号,形成了集传承人文传统、传导医学前沿、传播中华精粹于一体的蓬勃发展态势。医院始终坚持“人才第一”理念,建设了一支以学术大师为引领、名医名家为主体、中青年骨干为后继的专家队伍,成为中医药事业传承创新发展的坚强力量。先后涌现出董建华、王永炎、田金洲3位中国工程院院士,创造了中医系统脑病学科“一门三院士”的奇迹。医院培养出国医大师2人,全国名中医3人,首都国医名师20人,岐黄学者5人,青年岐黄学者2人,享受政府特殊津贴专家30人,“全国五一劳动奖章”获得者1人,全国卫生计生系统先进工作者1人。国家杰青1人,国家优青1人,北京市杰青1人,入选“国家级百千万人才工程”国家级人选1人,国家科技创新领军人才1人,国家科技创新青年拔尖人才1人,教育部“新世纪优秀人才支持计划”6人,全国优秀中医临床人才21人,“北京市科技新星”9人,首都名中医9人,首都青年名中医6人,优秀名中医1人,“首都十大健康卫士”2人,“首都健康卫士”4人,“白求恩式好医生”1人。具有高级专业技术职称者达458人。作为三级甲等中医医院,始终坚持守正创新,致力于以中医药和中西医结合手段解决重大疾病和现代难治病的防治问题,积极促进医学发展进步。拥有教育部重点学科1个,国家中医药管理局重点学科9个,北京市重点学科2个。国家临床重点专科6个,区域中医(专科)诊疗中心5个,国家中医药管理局重点专科16个,北京市重点专科13个。目前设置临床专业86个,编制床位1574张,职工总数2700余人;年门急诊量超过300万人次。脑病中心汇集脑病科、脑外科、脑病康复科、NICU、高压氧舱科等功能单元,床位300余张;心血管中心汇聚心血管科、心外科、心脏康复科、CICU等,床位200余张;肾病内分泌中心包括肾病科、内分泌科、透析室等,床位近200张;骨伤中心拥有6个病区,床位200余张;呼吸中心具有呼吸科、胸外科、RICU、气管镜介入中心等,床位150余张。五大中心均实行内科、外科、中医药康复一体化诊疗模式,显著提高医院的综合诊治能力。脾胃病中心、血液肿瘤中心、中医生殖中心(妇产科、男科)等亦以其鲜明特色和独特优势为全国各地患者提供优质服务。手术麻醉科、介入治疗中心、放射医学科、超声医学科、检验医学科和病理科等作为医院的医技平台和特色科室,配备有PETCT、MRI、CT、血管造影机、超声诊断仪、全自动生化检测仪、氩氦刀、光动力治疗仪等多种高端医疗设备1200余台件,总价值达到3亿元。作为大学临床医学院,医院始终坚持立德树人,一贯重视教育教学工作,形成了临床教学的特色优势,是高素质中医药人才培养的重要基地。拥有全国名老中医药专家传承工作室17个,北京中医药“薪火传承3+3”工程“二室一站”18个,教育部创新团队1个。一级学科学位授予点2个,涵盖6个博士学位授权点、7个硕士学位授权点。博士研究生导师73人,硕士研究生导师110人。获评国家级优秀教学团队1个、北京市优秀教学团队1个,国家中医药高等学校教学名师1人、北京市教学名师5人。医院以雄厚的师资队伍、优异的教学业绩和丰富的办学经验在业界享有盛誉,是国家级中医类别执业医师资格考试实践技能考试基地,北京市中医系统唯一的国家级住院医师规范化培训重点专业基地,教育部大学生校外实践教育基地。作为国家中医临床研究基地,医院始终坚持科技兴院,围绕国家战略需求和中医药重大科学问题,聚焦创新驱动,在中医临床科研前沿创造了突出业绩。拥有教育部中医内科学重点实验室1个,国家中医药管理局重点研究室3个,国家中医管理局三级实验室2个,北京市中医内科学重点实验室1个。获国家科技进步奖二等奖2项。在中国医院科技量值排名中,连续两年位列全国中医系统前三。医院承担的科研项目和经费持续增长,特别是国家自然科学基金课题数量与质量大幅提升,连续两年位列北京中医药大学二级院所和北京地区中医医院之首。医院注重平台建设,以权威机构和优势平台承载多项高层次研发项目,产出了临床科研开发的丰硕成果,在研究型中医院建设中迈出了坚实步伐。作为公立医疗机构,医院始终坚持把公益放在首位,以“大医精诚”践行初心使命,面向人民群众奉献大爱,将优秀医学论文书写在祖国大地上。充分发挥三甲医院重要作用,在全国率先搭建“医联体”平台,组建辐射全国多个省份的中医战略联盟,实施“全国乡村中医师3+3提升工程”、开创了培养农村中医药人才新模式。积极助力乡村振兴,落实援蒙、援疆及支援山西五寨、西藏班戈、甘肃定西等地的对口帮扶工作。在防控新冠肺炎疫情过程中,积极发挥中西医结合诊疗优势,以实际行动践行“敬佑生命、救死扶伤、甘于奉献、大爱无疆”精神。荣获“全国抗击新冠肺炎疫情先进集体”“北京市抗击新冠肺炎疫情先进集体”“全国卫生健康系统新冠肺炎疫情防控工作先进集体”,获评“全国抗击新冠肺炎疫情先进个人”1人,“全国卫生健康系统新冠肺炎疫情防控工作先进个人”1人,“北京市抗击新冠肺炎疫情先进个人”6人,“北京市先进工作者”1人,“首都中医榜样”3人。东直门医院援鄂医疗队凯旋旗、防护服、职工请战书等十余件抗疫物品被国家博物馆永久收藏。作为国家“双一流”建设高校的附院,医院始终坚持将全球视野作为办医的着眼点,立足首都、辐射全国、放眼世界,以服务人类健康为己任,形成跨越时空的东直门医院大医疗圈。早在1991年即建立了德国魁茨汀医院,成为欧洲最早纳入医疗保险的正规中医医院,迄今仍是唯一享有国外医保的中医医疗机构,被誉为中医药走向世界的典范。由东直门医院管理的美国中医中心、澳大利亚中医中心也是重要的中医药国际交流和展示窗口。2021年医院成为国家区域医疗中心建设输出医院,目前北京中医药大学东直门医院厦门医院、北京中医药大学东直门医院洛阳医院成为第三批国家区域医疗中心建设单位,至此医院总规划编制床位超过6000张,成为我国中医药领域“国之重器”,将为成就“国之大者”辉煌业绩发挥更加积极的作用。雄关漫道真如铁,而今迈步从头越。面向未来,医院将进一步弘扬“求是善行”的院训精神,把握机遇,乘势而上,踔厉奋发,勇毅前行,全面推进高质量内涵式发展,努力建设成为国内首善国际一流中医医院,为健康中国和人类卫生健康共同体贡献智慧和力量。松果体区实质细胞肿瘤包括松果体细胞;留和松果体母细胞瘤等。年龄分布范围较广,松果体细胞瘤多见于成人,儿童多为松果体母细胞瘤。,尚无明确病因,可能与遗传,内分泌改变,环境等因素有关,松果体,手术治疗,不确定,禁食油腻辛辣等刺激性比较强的食物,组织病理学检查,电镜检查,。

杨勇 主治医师

临床擅长治疗男科常见疾病,尤其擅长(阳痿,早泄,勃起不坚,肾虚,阴虚阳虚,阴阳两虚),慢性前列腺炎、前列腺增生、男性不育症、少弱精子症、遗精、射精障碍、勃起功能障碍、男性更年期综合征等,有丰富的中西医诊疗经验。诊疗特色:慢性前列腺炎的导浊通瘀疗法;针药并用治疗前列腺炎疼痛、排尿不适、性功能障碍等。

好评 99%
接诊量 3510
平均等待 30分钟
擅长:临床擅长治疗男科常见疾病,尤其擅长(阳痿,早泄,勃起不坚,肾虚,阴虚阳虚,阴阳两虚),慢性前列腺炎、前列腺增生、男性不育症、少弱精子症、遗精、射精障碍、勃起功能障碍、男性更年期综合征等,有丰富的中西医诊疗经验。诊疗特色:慢性前列腺炎的导浊通瘀疗法;针药并用治疗前列腺炎疼痛、排尿不适、性功能障碍等。
更多服务
李军 主任医师

女性内分泌失调、不孕症、各种月经失调、痛经、阴道炎、盆腔炎、宫颈病变、子宫内膜炎、HPV感染、多囊卵巢综合征、子宫肌瘤、先兆流产、复发性流产、更年期综合征、乳腺结节、产后病等常见妇科疾病的治疗及亚健康(脾虚、肾虚、气血不足、湿气、上热下寒)的调理。

好评 99%
接诊量 336
平均等待 2小时
擅长:女性内分泌失调、不孕症、各种月经失调、痛经、阴道炎、盆腔炎、宫颈病变、子宫内膜炎、HPV感染、多囊卵巢综合征、子宫肌瘤、先兆流产、复发性流产、更年期综合征、乳腺结节、产后病等常见妇科疾病的治疗及亚健康(脾虚、肾虚、气血不足、湿气、上热下寒)的调理。
更多服务
张宇 副主任医师

擅长用固肾护脑理论,培补先天,补虚后天为基础,治疗各种男性阳痿、早泄, 性功能下降、睾酮过低,怀孕困难等,以及脑血管相关疾病,头晕头痛,失眠焦虑抑郁等内科疾病,应用中医中药进行调理及治疗。

好评 100%
接诊量 1280
平均等待 15分钟
擅长:擅长用固肾护脑理论,培补先天,补虚后天为基础,治疗各种男性阳痿、早泄, 性功能下降、睾酮过低,怀孕困难等,以及脑血管相关疾病,头晕头痛,失眠焦虑抑郁等内科疾病,应用中医中药进行调理及治疗。
更多服务
杨永刚 主治医师

擅于治疗阳痿,早泄,性功能障碍,射精快,时间短,勃起困难,控精能力差,遗精证,肾精亏虚,硬度不够,中途疲软,勃起不坚,射精无力,肾阴虚,肾阳虚,肾虚证,湿气重,脾虚证,性欲减退低下,尿频,尿急,疏肝解郁,阴虚火旺,脾肾阳虚,阴虚火旺,气血两虚,肾气虚,湿热下注,下焦湿热,虚汗,肝胆湿热,舌诊,舌苔厚,肝血不足,脾胃不和,肝气郁结,肝肾阴虚,心脾两虚,中气不足,冠心病,高血压,高血脂,脑梗塞,便秘,咳嗽,痰湿,补气养血,心肾不交,气阴两虚,体虚多汗,祛湿排毒,降火,头晕目眩,耳鸣耳聋,腰膝酸软,乏力,易疲劳,脑供血不足。失眠健忘,尿不尽,阴囊潮湿,男性不育症,少精弱精,男性性功能障碍,早泄,前列腺炎,中风后遗症,冠心病,心衰,高血压,糖尿病,慢性胃炎,慢性咳嗽,月经不调,更年期综合征,肥胖等中西医结合辩证治疗!

好评 99%
接诊量 3973
平均等待 15分钟
擅长:擅于治疗阳痿,早泄,性功能障碍,射精快,时间短,勃起困难,控精能力差,遗精证,肾精亏虚,硬度不够,中途疲软,勃起不坚,射精无力,肾阴虚,肾阳虚,肾虚证,湿气重,脾虚证,性欲减退低下,尿频,尿急,疏肝解郁,阴虚火旺,脾肾阳虚,阴虚火旺,气血两虚,肾气虚,湿热下注,下焦湿热,虚汗,肝胆湿热,舌诊,舌苔厚,肝血不足,脾胃不和,肝气郁结,肝肾阴虚,心脾两虚,中气不足,冠心病,高血压,高血脂,脑梗塞,便秘,咳嗽,痰湿,补气养血,心肾不交,气阴两虚,体虚多汗,祛湿排毒,降火,头晕目眩,耳鸣耳聋,腰膝酸软,乏力,易疲劳,脑供血不足。失眠健忘,尿不尽,阴囊潮湿,男性不育症,少精弱精,男性性功能障碍,早泄,前列腺炎,中风后遗症,冠心病,心衰,高血压,糖尿病,慢性胃炎,慢性咳嗽,月经不调,更年期综合征,肥胖等中西医结合辩证治疗!
更多服务
余惠平 主任医师

儿童体质调养(小儿上火、小儿呕吐、小儿腹胀、婴幼儿腹泻、小儿营养不良、胎毒)、儿童血小板减少症(缺铁性贫血)、过敏性紫癜、厌食(小儿积食、小儿疳积、小儿营养不良、脾胃虚弱)、咳喘(小儿过敏性鼻炎、急性喉炎、支气管炎)、肾病综合征

好评 99%
接诊量 199
平均等待 1小时
擅长:儿童体质调养(小儿上火、小儿呕吐、小儿腹胀、婴幼儿腹泻、小儿营养不良、胎毒)、儿童血小板减少症(缺铁性贫血)、过敏性紫癜、厌食(小儿积食、小儿疳积、小儿营养不良、脾胃虚弱)、咳喘(小儿过敏性鼻炎、急性喉炎、支气管炎)、肾病综合征
更多服务
王建伟 主治医师

中医药治疗中风、失眠、头晕、抑郁、焦虑、痴呆、脑血管病(脑梗死,脑出血)等多种神经系统疾病,以及脾虚、肾虚,早泄、勃起障碍、虚劳等男科疾病。

好评 100%
接诊量 65
平均等待 15分钟
擅长:中医药治疗中风、失眠、头晕、抑郁、焦虑、痴呆、脑血管病(脑梗死,脑出血)等多种神经系统疾病,以及脾虚、肾虚,早泄、勃起障碍、虚劳等男科疾病。
更多服务
张华 主治医师

肥胖、痛风、糖尿病、高尿酸血症、甲状腺疾病(甲亢、甲状腺结节,甲亢甲减、甲状腺炎,甲状腺术后调理),多汗及排汗异常,逆转早期糖尿病、糖尿病肾病,糖尿病神经病变,蛋白尿,肾功能不全;失眠,代谢性脂肪肝、胃肠病、体质调理及亚健康、疲劳综合症等,提供日常慢病管理与康复的咨询建议。

好评 100%
接诊量 114
平均等待 1小时
擅长:肥胖、痛风、糖尿病、高尿酸血症、甲状腺疾病(甲亢、甲状腺结节,甲亢甲减、甲状腺炎,甲状腺术后调理),多汗及排汗异常,逆转早期糖尿病、糖尿病肾病,糖尿病神经病变,蛋白尿,肾功能不全;失眠,代谢性脂肪肝、胃肠病、体质调理及亚健康、疲劳综合症等,提供日常慢病管理与康复的咨询建议。
更多服务
张庆 主治医师

擅长治疗中西医结合治疗呼吸系统疾病(咳嗽、肺结节,呼吸道感染、支气管炎、肺炎、哮喘,肺气肿、慢阻肺等),危重症,消化系统疾病(腹胀、便秘、反酸烧心),偏头痛、水肿等内科杂病,也擅长指导老年患者养生保健。

好评 99%
接诊量 265
平均等待 2小时
擅长:擅长治疗中西医结合治疗呼吸系统疾病(咳嗽、肺结节,呼吸道感染、支气管炎、肺炎、哮喘,肺气肿、慢阻肺等),危重症,消化系统疾病(腹胀、便秘、反酸烧心),偏头痛、水肿等内科杂病,也擅长指导老年患者养生保健。
更多服务
丛龙皎 主治医师

慢性腹泻、便秘、消化性溃疡、胃食管反流病、功能性胃肠病、消化道相关癌前病变的中西医结合诊治,熟练掌握电子胃镜操作及内镜下诊断。

好评 -
接诊量 -
平均等待 -
擅长:慢性腹泻、便秘、消化性溃疡、胃食管反流病、功能性胃肠病、消化道相关癌前病变的中西医结合诊治,熟练掌握电子胃镜操作及内镜下诊断。
更多服务
王林洋 副主任医师

擅长中西医结合诊治呼吸系统疾病,如感冒,发热,鼻炎,咽炎,急慢性咳嗽,呼吸道感染,哮喘、支气管扩张、慢阻肺、肺结节、肺纤维化、肺癌等,对于失眠,头痛,腹胀腹痛,以及免疫力低下的疾病均有有深入研究。

好评 99%
接诊量 299
平均等待 30分钟
擅长:擅长中西医结合诊治呼吸系统疾病,如感冒,发热,鼻炎,咽炎,急慢性咳嗽,呼吸道感染,哮喘、支气管扩张、慢阻肺、肺结节、肺纤维化、肺癌等,对于失眠,头痛,腹胀腹痛,以及免疫力低下的疾病均有有深入研究。
更多服务

患友问诊

患者体检发现松果体囊肿,担心其对健康的影响,并因高血压和焦虑而感到不安。
27
2024-10-31 13:21:35
我在松原市,最近总是头痛,去过松原市第一人民医院但被告知不在他们的诊疗范围内,想了解其他医院的推荐和用药建议。
14
2024-10-31 13:21:35
我在人民医院检查出了一种叫做松果体肿瘤的病,已经有20年的头痛史,医生说可能需要手术。请问这是什么病?会很严重吗?
51
2024-10-31 13:21:35
患者最近被诊断出有松果体区瘤,担心手术后的恢复情况和是否需要用药,希望得到专业的解答。
18
2024-10-31 13:21:35
患者想了解红豆杉果肉的食用安全性,特别是是否有副作用和对高血压的影响。
52
2024-10-31 13:21:35
我最近检查出有一个10mm的松果体囊肿,并伴有恶心呕吐的症状,想知道是否需要治疗?
29
2024-10-31 13:21:35
我最近头痛、恶心,视力模糊,病理检查显示我有松果体母瘤,想了解更多关于这种疾病的信息。患者信息:无特殊情况。
60
2024-10-31 13:21:35
7岁男孩,刚做完松果体瘤切除手术,甲胎蛋白恢复正常,想知道是否需要进行放化疗?
7
2024-10-31 13:21:35
一位70多岁的患者发现自己有一个松果体囊肿,担心是否有癌细胞,想知道如何确定是否有转移和最佳的治疗方式。
48
2024-10-31 13:21:35
14岁孩子松果体肿瘤手术切除后出现并发症,包括肿胀和进行了切骨术降压,如何处理?
47
2024-10-31 13:21:35

科普文章

氨氯地平贝那普利片(I)治疗高血压该如何服药

佐米曲普坦的注意事项

很多男性朋友在就诊时会担心自己是否是前列腺炎,今天我们就来讲解一下前列腺炎和勃起功能障碍之间的一些关系。

勃起功能障碍(ED)和前列腺炎是男性常见的两种健康问题,它们虽然不同,但可能存在一定的联系。了解这些区别和联系对于维护男性健康至关重要。

 
一、勃起功能障碍(ED)
 
勃起功能障碍是指男性在性行为中无法获得或维持足够的勃起硬度以完成性交。这种情况可能由多种因素引起,包括心理因素和生理因素。
 
1. 心理因素:压力、焦虑、抑郁或性心理障碍都可能导致勃起功能障碍。例如,长期的心理压力和焦虑可能会影响男性的性欲和勃起能力。
 
2. 生理因素:血管问题(如动脉硬化)、神经问题、内分泌问题(如睾酮水平低下)、药物副作用、手术或创伤等也可能导致勃起功能障碍。例如,动脉硬化可能会影响血液流动,从而导致勃起困难。
 
二、前列腺炎
 
前列腺炎是前列腺的炎症,可能由感染或非感染因素引起。
 
1. 感染因素:细菌感染是引起前列腺炎的一种常见原因。细菌可能通过尿道进入前列腺,引发炎症。
 
2. 非感染因素:除了感染,前列腺炎还可能由其他非感染因素引起,如长期憋尿、久坐、饮酒过度等。这些因素可能导致前列腺充血,引发炎症。
 
三、勃起功能障碍与前列腺炎的可能联系
 
虽然勃起功能障碍和前列腺炎是两种不同的疾病,但它们之间可能存在一定的联系。前列腺炎可能导致勃起功能障碍。例如,前列腺炎可能引起会阴部或下腹部疼痛,这些疼痛和不适可能影响男性的性欲和勃起能力。此外,前列腺炎可能导致内分泌失调,如睾酮水平低下,从而影响勃起功能。
 
总之,勃起功能障碍和前列腺炎都是男性常见的健康问题,它们之间可能存在一定的联系。如果您遇到这些问题,建议及时就医,接受专业的治疗和建议。同时,保持良好的生活习惯,如适量运动、避免久坐、减少饮酒等,也有助于预防这些问题的发生。
勃起功能障碍(ED),即男性突然不能勃起的现象,是一个复杂的问题,可能由多种因素引起。这些因素可以大致分为心理原因、行为习惯、器质性伤害和药物影响四大类。
 

心理原因:心理因素是导致ED的常见原因之一。这些因素可能包括对怀孕或性传播疾病的担忧,对性行为的紧张、焦虑或恐惧,以及缺乏隐私或舒适的环境。

感情问题,如夫妻感情冷淡或审美疲劳,也可能影响男性的性功能。

此外,性知识缺乏或性经验不足也可能导致ED。

行为习惯:某些行为习惯也可能对男性的性功能产生不良影响。例如,过度自慰可能导致不应期延长,从而影响勃起功能。长时间的熬夜和久坐、酗酒和吸烟等不良生活习惯也可能引发ED。
器质性伤害:生殖器官的异常或伤害、内分泌问题(如糖尿病、甲状腺功能异常等)、神经系统病变(如脊髓损伤、多发性硬化症等)和血管问题(如动脉粥样硬化、高脂血症等)都可能导致ED。这些问题通常需要医疗干预来解决。
药物影响:某些药物可能导致ED,如抗高血压药、抗抑郁药等。在这种情况下,可能需要与医生协商调整药物方案。
 
总之,ED可能由多种因素引起,治疗ED需要综合考虑各种可能性。在面对ED时,男性应该及时寻求医疗帮助,同时注意调整自己的生活习惯和心理状态。

病症: 胃癌 恶性黑色素瘤

患者:李女士

年龄:70岁

罹患癌症,毫无疑问对每个人都是重大打击。而如果一位患者不幸同时罹患两种癌症,我们可以想象得出他的心情会是怎样的沉重。

但时至今日,癌症早已不再是什么“不治之症”,很多良好的治疗方法,可帮助患者迈过重重困境,预后得到极大提升。

不仅如此,在医疗全球化的今天,中国患者也能通过“海外二诊”服务,快速触达到国际权威专家资源,为自己的治疗保驾护航!

今天的案例主人公李女士,正是一位“海外二诊”的受益者。我们来一起看看她的故事。*为保护隐私,文中患者个人信息均已经脱敏处理。

70岁的李女士在去年年底,因脚底疼痛去医院看病,结果发现脚后跟有一个1厘米的黑色肿物。医生判断是冻疮,于是开了点外用药,李女士也就没有再放在心上。

大概4个月后,真正的噩梦降临:李女士通过影像检查,被诊断为胃癌,而且有了淋巴结转移。 她还出现了多次呕血,病情非常危急。很快,医生为她实施了全胃切除。令人意想不到的是,几天后通过检查,医生发现李女士后脚跟的肿物竟然也是癌症——恶性黑色素瘤。于是大概2个月后,医生又切除了她的足底肿瘤。 

为了降低复发风险,李女士开始了3个周期的化疗联合免疫治疗(替吉奥联合纳武单抗)。

虽然该做的都已做完,但对于李女士来说,恐惧感还远未被消除。因为癌症最令人恐惧的,是其具有“复发转移”的能力 。一旦癌症再次袭来,李女士不知道自己该如何应对。另外,两种癌症的治疗以及术后辅助药物治疗,也让李女士遭遇了一些副作用。比如腹泻、味觉障碍还有体重明显下降的问题。这些对于已经70岁的李女士来说,都很影响生活质量,所以迫切需要解决。

在本次的国际专家“海外二诊”服务中,李女士预约的是来自日本某知名综合性医院肿瘤中心的外科部长医生,他的专长领域既包括肿瘤外科,又包括各类癌症药物疗法、姑息治疗,是一位“内外兼修”的权威专家。在充分了解了李女士既往的病情和治疗经过后,医生很快通过远程会诊的方式,为患者详细解答了当前她的所有问题。

1、 未来如果转移或复发了该怎么办?  

医生:假如您未来不幸出现转移或复发,那么化疗是核心治疗手段。对于单发的孤立转移灶,可以选择手术、放疗来进行局部治疗。

具体化疗方案选择,我按使用的先后顺序列出了3类,当前面的方案失效后,可更换为后面的方案。

一类方案:化疗联合/不联合免疫方案  

  • CAPOX (卡培他滨+奥沙利铂)±O药(即免疫药物纳武单抗)
  • SOX (替吉奥+奥沙利铂)±O药
  • FOLFOX (5-FU+奥沙利铂)±O药

二类方案:化疗联合/不联合抗血管药物方案  

  • Taxane (紫杉醇/白蛋白结合型紫杉醇/多西紫杉醇)±雷莫芦单抗

三类方案:化疗方案  

  • 曲氟尿苷/盐酸替吡嘧啶
  • 伊立替康

  2、N K细胞疗法是否对我有帮助?副作用是否可控?   X医生:目前尚没有证据表明NK细胞疗法对癌症有效,因此不予推荐。

3、口服替吉奥会腹泻,是否需要调整方案?   II/III期胃癌患者术后采用辅助治疗方案,分别为:

  • 替吉奥口服 1 年(口服 4 周,停药 2 周,共 8 个疗程或口服 2 周,停药 1 周,共 16个疗程)
  • CAPOX (卡培他滨+奥沙利铂) 共半年(每 3 周一次,共 8 个疗程)
  • SOX (替吉奥+奥沙利铂) 共半年(每 3 周一次,共 8 个疗程)

这三种方案中,替吉奥方案和CAPOX方案等效,但SOX要优于替吉奥。另外,胃癌术后直接使用纳武单抗免疫治疗无意义。

替吉奥确实会出现腹泻等代表性不良反应,患者可以考虑对症治疗,比如调节肠道的药物、止泻药等缓解副作用。如果副作用太严重,那么可以考虑减少药物剂量。

替吉奥的标准用药剂量为120mg,但用量低于80mg无法达到预期效果。如果当前患者用药为100mg,那么为了降低副作用,可以减少剂量到80mg;但如果目前剂量已经是80mg,则无法进一步降低剂量,此时考虑更换方案为CAPOX方案替代。 如果不良反应严重到干扰日常生活,则患者可以选择停药,持续观察病情变化。

对于无淋巴结转移的II期B和II其C的患者,可选择使用1年帕博丽珠单抗免疫治疗。

4 、术后患者很瘦,味觉障碍,如何调理改善?   通常,手术后患者体重会减轻20%左右。这是患者消化吸收能力低下、促食欲的胃肠激素减少引起的。大约6个月到1年时间,患者可以恢复正常。

味觉障碍可能是抗癌药的副作用引起的,也可能是饮食减少导致缺乏锌等微量元素引起的。建议患者采用少食多餐的方式饮食,每天分5-6次吃饭。在日本,我们有时也会给患者用一些营养补充剂。

另外,也可以考虑采用中草药的对症治疗,改善症状,比如十全大补汤、六君子汤。 会诊结束后,李女士的心情得到了极大的平复。她对自己未来要走的路更清晰了,也对日本专家的细致指导和会诊的快速响应非常满意。

中国是消化道癌症发病数量较多的国家,根据国家癌症中心发布的《2022年中国恶性肿瘤疾病负担情况》数据,2022年我国胃癌新发病例约为35.87万例,死亡人数26.04万人。

总体来说,胃癌属于严重威胁我国国民生命健康的蕞常见癌症之一。胃癌如能在早、中期发现,还是有很大机会通过手术实现根治的,患者仍有一定机会得到临床治愈(术后5年不复发即为临床治愈)。

但在胃癌患者中,一部分人会因为【年龄较高】、伴有诸多【基础病】等问题,对手术存有疑虑,担心“下不来手术台”,甚至会放弃手术机会,选择吃药等姑息治疗。这样的选择真的正确吗?现如今的技术能否支持这类老年患者安全手术呢?接下来,我们一起看一个真实案例。

01七旬老人遭遇中期胃癌

一位七十多岁的“老胃病”项女士,因短时间体重骤降(8斤)前往就医。血液检测显示,她有一项指标异常升高。进一步检查发现,她的食道和胃连接的地方(贲门)以及胃的“外墙”(胃壁)都变得异常的厚,而且形状不均匀——这正是胃癌常见的表现。

医生随后通过胃镜检查和病例活检(取一小块组织观察上面的细胞),确诊了老人患有胃癌。由于还没有出现胃以外的远处其他器官的转移,也没有附近淋巴结转移,因此项女士的胃癌分期为中期。虽不是早期,但中期胃癌通常是可以手术的。为项女士提供诊疗的医生也表示,可以通过全胃切除手术实现根治。

但一来项女士已经七十多岁,二来她有20多年的糖尿病(手术伤口会更慢愈合、感染风险高、术后并发症风险高)、右肺还有一枚1.2厘米的肺结节。种种问题让老人和家人们都比较犹豫,担心扛不住治疗,最终“越治越糟”。在这样的背景下,项女士决定找一位足够权威的外科专家,来为自己进行全面评估,看看能不能兼顾好肿瘤根治以及手术的安全性。

不久后,项女士预约了来自日本癌研有明医院消化中心胃外科部长布部创也医生为自己提供指导。

02日本专家咨询内容分享

在充分了解了项女士的病情信息和全部资料后,布部创也医生给出了如下指导建议:首先,患者此前接受的是普通CT而非增强CT,胃镜也没有清晰展示食道上肿瘤具体侵犯的程度,因此很难得出精准的分期判断。

后面患者来癌研有明医院就医时,医疗团队会在治疗前为她做一套非常精细、全面的检查,此后就可以明确肿瘤情况了。届时如果发现患者的分期、肿瘤侵犯的范围确实和现在的结果相同,那么可以通过一个腹腔镜微创手术实现根治,损伤会非常小;如果届时发现肿瘤侵犯食道过多,则需要消化道联合食道外科共同进行胸腔镜手术治疗。

但无论是哪一种情况,患者都可以耐受手术,并且保留一部分胃。癌研有明医院是一家极为擅长肿瘤微创手术的知名癌症专科医院。在胃癌方面,2005年,医院开始导入腹腔镜,2019年又引入了达芬奇手术机器人,患者术后并发症更少了。如今,癌研有明医院98%的外科手术都采用微创。

受益于此,很多在别的医院需要胃全切的胃癌患者,到癌研有明后可以保留一部分胃,还能兼顾临床治愈。这对于术后患者的长期营养摄入和体重维持都很有帮助。布部创也医生所在科室的主要目标之一,正是在做到根治性切除的前提之下,将原本的胃全切术式变为次全胃切除术,尽可能为患者保留一些胃,让他们未来的生活质量得到提升。

那么项女士的糖尿病问题,会不会影响到手术呢?对此,布部创也医生认为完全不必担心,因为对于这类患者,癌研有明医院会进行详细的术前评估,并且有专业团队介入,从生活方式调整和专业治疗入手,帮助患者控制好血糖,让血糖水平达到符合手术的标准,从而降低术后愈合不良风险。

关于肺部的1.2厘米结节,布部医生认为可以暂不处理,无论它到底是良性还是恶性。因为这枚结节属于纯磨玻璃结节,即便是恶性,进展也非常缓慢,并不会快速出现转移扩散。而胃癌根治手术虽然会采用微创方式,但依然会给患者带来一定的负担,如果同时处理肺结节,会导致负担过重、患者难以承受。所以当前蕞好的处理办法,是先集中精力解决胃癌肿瘤,术后安排呼吸科专家为患者进行肺结节诊断,给出随访或手术或根治性放疗的建议。

03项女士术后,是否需要化疗来降低复发风险、争取更大治愈希望?

对此,布部创也医生表示,是否化疗现在还不能判断。因为术后患者能获得蕞精准的分期判断,有可能患者术前被认为是2期,但实际上术后成了1期(无需化疗);有时也可能患者术前是1期,但术后成了2-3期。假如是2-3期,则患者术后需要坚持1年的辅助化疗,大概可以降低10%的复发风险。

当地时间10月29日礼来宣布了Ⅲb期临床试验(TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 6)的积极结果,对于早期症状性阿尔茨海默病成人患者,用改良滴定方案接受donanemab治疗的患者在24周主要终点时,伴水肿/积液的淀粉样蛋白相关影像学异常(ARIA-E)有所减少。

donanemab这个新药在今年7月获批于美国,又在之后获日本厚生劳动省、英国药品和医疗产品监管局批准,用于轻度阿尔茨海默病、轻度认知功能障碍的治疗。donanemab在国内2023年取得突破性治疗药物认定,并纳入优先审评审批程序,目前还在审评审批过程中。

CDE官网截图

但在FDA说明书中有黑框警告,大意是应用该药时应注意淀粉样蛋白相关影像学异常(ARIA),表现为ARIA-E和ARIA伴含铁血黄素沉积(ARIA-H),通常发生在治疗早期,且无症状,很少发生严重和危及生命的事件。本次试验的积极结果和这个黑框警告相关。一起来看详情。

FDA说明书截图

给药方式有哪些改变?会不会影响效果?

TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 6是一项多中心随机双盲Ⅲb期研究,主要研究donanemab的不同给药方案对早期症状性AD患者ARIA-E和淀粉样蛋白清除率的影响,这里的早期AD指的是轻度认知障碍(MCI)和轻度痴呆疾病阶段。

给药方式和既往不同,既往标准给药方案是在前三次输注时接受2瓶(700mg)donanemab,然后再接受4瓶(1400mg);改良滴定方式是患者第一次输注1瓶(350mg),第二次输注2瓶(700mg),第三次输注3瓶(1050mg),此后每次输注4瓶(1400mg)。

研究的主要终点是第24周时患者出现ARIA-E占总参与者的比例,结果显示接受改良滴定方式的患者ARIA-E发生率为14%,而标准给药方案为24%,相对风险降低41%。载脂蛋白E(APOE)是已知的阿尔茨海默病遗传风险因素的携带者,在这些患者中,19%患者在改良滴定时患有ARIA-E,而标准给药方案中为57%,相对风险降低67%。

看到这里你或许也有疑问,虽然ARIA-E的发生风险降低了,但改良滴定方案会不会影响疗效?答案是不会。

与接受标准给药方案的患者相比,改良滴定患者淀粉样斑块和p-tau217减少。改良滴定的患者的淀粉样斑块水平较基线平均降低 67%,而标准给药组患者为69%。

参考来源

1.Modified Titration of Donanemab Demonstrated Reduction of ARIA-E in Early Symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease Patients in Phase Ⅲb study.

2.CED官网.

3.A Study of Different Donanemab (LY3002813) Dosing Regimens in Adults With Early Alzheimer's Disease (TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 6).

当地时间10月29日,阿西米尼(asciminib)获美国食品药品管理局(FDA)加速批准[1] ,用于慢性期新诊断的费城染色体阳性慢性粒细胞白血病(Ph+CML)成年患者。CML是一种骨髓和血细胞癌症,通常由费城染色体的异常染色体引起。在一线治疗中,约1/3的患者会出现下列问题:由于不良反应或者治疗无效而停止酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)治疗。

为了解决这一问题,需要开发新的药物,asciminib就是解决这一困境的新药。早在2022年8月,加拿大药物和卫生技术局(CADTH)建议[2] :“若满足条件,可通过公共药物计划报销asciminib用于治疗费城染色体阳性慢性粒细胞白血病。”

asciminib为何得到FDA的青睐?

本次获批基于一项III期多中心随机研究,研究目的是比较每日80mg的asciminib与TKI治疗的疗效。TKI治疗是接受伊马替尼、尼洛替尼、达沙替尼或博舒替尼任意一种治疗。

共有405名患者被随机分配(1:1)进两组治疗。主要疗效结局指标是48周时的主要分子反应(MMR)率。这个指标是慢性髓性白血病的关键指标,这个比例越高,说明该治疗在基因水平上对疾病的控制效果越好,能够更有效地抑制疾病相关基因的表达,进而有望更好地控制疾病的进展、改善患者的症状和预后。

研究结果显示,48周时MMR率方面,asciminib组中为68%(95% CI: 61, 74),TKI组为49%(95% CI: 42, 56),二者相差19%。细看具体的TKI,入组伊马替尼和其他TKI药物入组比例为1:1;asciminib组的MMR率为69%(95% CI: 59, 78),而伊马替尼组为40%(95% CI: 31, 50),相差近30%(95% CI: 17, 42)。

这个新药安全吗?每周需要打几次药?

根据FDA数据显示,在新诊断和既往接受过治疗的患者,应用新药最常见的不良反应(≥20%)是肌肉骨骼疼痛、皮疹、疲劳、上呼吸道感染、头痛、腹痛和腹泻。若只看新诊断的患者,最常见的实验室异常(≥40%)是淋巴细胞计数降低、白细胞计数降低、血小板计数降低、中性粒细胞计数降低等。

根据FDA已批准的asciminib说明书,用药期间还需要注意一下事项:

1.骨髓抑制 :用药期间可能因出现骨髓抑制,发生血小板减少症、中性粒细胞减少症和贫血。用药应在治疗的前3个月,需要每两周进行一次全血细胞计数,此后每月进行一次检测,从而判断患者有无骨髓抑制症状。根据严重程度,咨询医生是否需要停药。

2.胰腺毒性 :患者可能出现血清脂肪酶和淀粉酶无症状升高,每月需评估血清脂肪酶和淀粉酶水平,如果您有胰腺炎,则注意主动告知医生,需要进行频率更高的检测。

3.高血压风险 :可能出现3级或4级高血压风险,应注意检测血压。

4.超敏反应 :可能出现3级或4级超敏反应,包括皮疹、水肿和支气管痉挛。如果出现这些症状,需及时反馈医生,医生会根据超敏反应的体征和症状,开始适当的治疗。

5.心血管毒性 :如果您有心血管病史,需要告知医生;对于3级或更高级别的心血管毒性,医生会考虑暂停用药、减少剂量或永久停药。

6.胚胎/胎儿毒性 :若您在怀孕期间用药或在服用药物期间怀孕,可能对孩子有潜在风险。这个新药是口服药,需要根据不同的给药剂量(80mg或40mg)每天/或每两天用药。

近些年来,还有哪些白血病药物获批FDA?

根据FDA肿瘤学/血液系统恶性肿瘤批准通知,白血病相关新药整理如下表。

另外可以看出21年时asciminib已获批白血病治疗,但限定既往接受过两种或更多TKIs治疗,本次获批属于扩大适应证。

参考来源:

1.FDA grants accelerated approval to asciminib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. 2.Asciminib(Scemblix):CADTHReimbursementRecommendation:Indication:ForthetreatmentofadultpatientswithPhiladelphiachromosome-positivechronicmyeloidleukemia(Ph+CML)inchronicphase(CP)previouslytreatedwith2ormoretyrosinekinaseinhibitors.Ottawa(ON):CanadianAgencyforDrugsandTechnologiesinHealth;2022Aug.PMID:38713779. 3.AStudyofOralAsciminibVersusOtherTKIsinAdultPatientsWithNewlyDiagnosedPh+CML-CP. 4.Product information:SCEMBLIX-asciminibtablet,filmcoated.UpdatedAugust7,2024. 5.Oncology(Cancer)/HematologicMalignanciesApprovalNotifications.

除了骤降的气温

接下来上场的

是各个呼吸道疾病

他们会在你没换上秋裤的某一个夜晚悄悄潜入

流感

就是其中之一

  • 什么是流感

流行性感冒,简称流感,是由流感病毒引起的急性呼吸道传染病。流感病毒分为甲、乙、丙三型,能够引起爆发流行的主要是甲型、乙型。 易感人群: 流感病毒对于所有人群都普遍易感,但儿童更容易感染流感等呼吸道传染病,主要与接触机会有关。

  • 流感的主要症状

全身症状明显,如高热、头痛、咽痛、咳嗽、鼻塞、流涕、全身酸痛、寒颤、乏力、食欲减退等。肺炎是流感最常见的并发症之一,会出现咳嗽、胸痛、咳痰、发热、呼吸困难等,严重者出现呼吸衰竭。

  • 中招流感怎么治疗

流感治疗主要是对症治疗和对因治疗两部分。

对症治疗:流涕、发烧、疼痛的时候给予抗过敏,减少充血,以及退热止痛的药物治疗。咳嗽咳痰严重者可服用止咳祛痰药物。

对因治疗:对于 儿童 ,应该尽早的开始抗流感病毒的药物治疗,奥司他韦等神经氨酸酶抑制剂是流感的有效治疗药物,早期尤其是发病 48 小时之内应用抗流感病毒药物,能显著降低流感重症和死亡的发生率。即便超过48小时以上,抗病毒治疗仍是有效的治疗措施。

提示:本内容仅作参考,不能代替面诊(文中所提及药品,必须在专业医生的指导下使用),如有不适请尽快线下

以下内容来源于新英格兰医学杂志。

Presentation of Case

Dr. Carrie Chui (Neurology): A 79-year-old man was admitted to this hospital because of involuntary movements on the left side and transient unresponsiveness.
The patient had been in his usual state of health until 9 months before admission, when involuntary movements of the left shoulder and left side of the face developed. The movements were described by the patient as twitching, were not associated with a change in the level of consciousness, and resolved after 1 to 2 minutes. During the next 6 months, the patient had similar episodes approximately once per month, but the episodes increased in duration, lasting 5 to 6 minutes.
Three months before admission, the episodes of involuntary movements increased in frequency, and the patient was evaluated by his primary care physician. The physical examination was normal. Results of kidney-function tests were normal, as were blood levels of glucose and electrolytes, except for the sodium level, which was 129 mmol per liter (reference range, 135 to 145). There was a history of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion, and the sodium level was similar to levels obtained during the past 4 years. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the head (Figure 1A), performed before and after the administration of intravenous contrast material, revealed a focus of enhancement in the right middle frontal gyrus that was thought to be a small vascular anomaly. Electroencephalography (EEG), performed with the patient in awake and drowsy states, revealed rare, brief, focal slowing in the left temporal lobe during drowsiness; no epileptiform abnormalities were present.
Figure 1
MRI of the Head and CT Angiogram of the Head and Neck.
Two months before admission, the patient was evaluated in the epilepsy clinic affiliated with this hospital. He reported that the episodes of involuntary movements had increased in both frequency and duration, occurring once or twice per day and lasting approximately 10 minutes. Episodes began with tingling and numbness in the left leg that prompted the patient to voluntarily stomp the left foot to relieve the uncomfortable sensation. Then, the patient had involuntary movements that he described as an uncontrollable invisible force moving the left leg and arm, with hyperextension of the arm backward and pronation of the wrist. There was associated numbness in the distal portions of the left third, fourth, and fifth fingers and involuntary movement of the left cheek. No prodromal symptoms occurred. The patient had awareness during the episodes, and after the episodes, he felt fatigued but had a normal level of consciousness, without confusion. The examination in the epilepsy clinic was normal. A diagnosis of seizure disorder was considered, and treatment with levetiracetam was started.
Three weeks before admission, the patient was again evaluated in the epilepsy clinic. He reported that the episodes of involuntary movements still occurred on a daily basis but had decreased in duration and involved only the left leg, without abnormal movements of the arm or face. Dizziness, headache, and weakness had developed and were attributed to the use of levetiracetam. The patient’s family had recorded a video of one of the episodes of involuntary movements. After reviewing the video, the patient’s neurologist thought that the episodes were less likely to be caused by seizures and more consistent with choreoathetoid movements. Cross-tapering of medications — with the simultaneous administration of levetiracetam in decreasing doses and clobazam in increasing doses — was initiated, and the patient was referred to the movement disorders clinic affiliated with this hospital.
On the morning of admission, an episode of involuntary movements of the left leg and left shoulder occurred and persisted for 1 hour. Several hours after the symptoms abated, the patient’s wife found the patient to be unresponsive; he was sitting in a chair. Emergency medical services were called, and when they arrived, the patient was responsive. The fingerstick blood glucose level was 180 mg per deciliter (10.0 mmol per liter) and the blood pressure 110/80 mm Hg. The patient was transported to the emergency department of this hospital for further evaluation.
In the emergency department, the patient reported dysuria and increased urinary frequency. The patient’s daughter noted that he had been more anxious during the past 3 years and occasionally had trouble with memory. Other medical history included Barrett’s esophagus, benign prostatic hypertrophy, chronic hepatitis B virus infection, eczema, gastroesophageal reflux disease, hypertension, nonischemic cardiomyopathy, and osteoporosis. There was no history of head trauma or extended loss of consciousness. Medications included aspirin, atorvastatin, doxazosin, finasteride, omeprazole, metoprolol, sacubitril, and valsartan. There were no known drug allergies. The patient was a lifelong nonsmoker and drank alcohol rarely; he did not use illicit drugs. His mother had had gastric cancer, and his sister had had esophageal cancer; there was no family history of seizures.
On examination, the temporal temperature was 36.8°C, the blood pressure 152/97 mm Hg, the pulse 65 beats per minute, the respiratory rate 16 breaths per minute, and the oxygen saturation 96% while the patient was breathing ambient air. The body-mass index (the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) was 21.7. The blood pressure decreased to 130/63 mm Hg with standing. The patient was alert and interactive. The lower jaw was held to the left, but the nasolabial folds and smile were symmetric with activation. There were nonrhythmic, nonstereotyped, writhing movements of the left arm. Tone was normal, and strength was assessed as 5 out of 5 in the arms and legs. Results of liver-function and kidney-function tests were normal, as were blood levels of glucose and electrolytes, except for the sodium level, which was 125 mmol per liter. The lactate level was 2.1 mmol per liter (19 mg per deciliter; reference range, 0.5 to 2.0 mmol per liter [5 to 18 mg per deciliter]). The urinalysis was normal. Intravenous fluids were administered. Imaging studies were obtained.
Dr. Rajiv Gupta: Computed tomographic (CT) angiography of the head and neck (Figure 1B) revealed extensively calcified plaque with severe stenosis of the distal right common carotid artery (CCA), extending into the proximal right internal carotid artery (ICA), as well as stenosis of the right and left paraclinoid ICAs and the left vertebral artery at its origin. There was no vascular abnormality on the CT angiogram that corresponded to the abnormality in the right middle frontal gyrus seen on the previous MRI.
Dr. Chui: The patient was admitted to the hospital. On the second hospital day, the sodium level had increased to 130 mmol per liter, and the lactate level was normal. Additional imaging studies were obtained.
Dr. Gupta: MRI of the head showed no evidence of acute infarction. The focus of enhancement in the right frontal lobe that had been noted previously was not seen on the current MRI.
Dr. Chui: Blood levels of thyrotropin, cobalamin, and glycated hemoglobin and results of coagulation tests were normal. Screening tests for Lyme disease, tuberculosis, and syphilis were negative, as were tests for antibodies to cardiolipin and β2-glycoprotein. A test for antinuclear antibodies was positive, at a titer of 1:160 in a homogeneous pattern. During a physical therapy session, the patient had abnormal movements of the left leg, left arm, and left side of the face. The abnormal movements diminished when the patient used distraction techniques, such as thigh tapping, finger snapping, and walking while holding a glass of water.
The transient unresponsiveness that led to the patient’s admission was attributed to a combination of sedation from clobazam and hypovolemia. Treatment with clobazam was stopped, and hydration was encouraged. A diagnosis of functional neurologic disorder was considered; outpatient physical therapy with continued use of distraction techniques was recommended. The patient was discharged home on the third hospital day.
Episodes of involuntary movements continued to occur on a daily basis at home. Two weeks after discharge, when the patient was doing exercises while sitting in a chair and having a conversation with his wife, he suddenly stopped talking. She found him slumped in the chair with his eyes closed, no longer exercising. When she asked him questions, he repeatedly said “yes.” Emergency medical services were called, and when they arrived, the patient was alert, diaphoretic, and nonverbal. He had a facial droop on the left side and a right gaze preference. The fingerstick blood glucose level was 130 mg per deciliter (7.2 mmol per liter) and the blood pressure 120/60 mm Hg. The patient was transported to the emergency department of this hospital for further evaluation.
In the emergency department, the temporal temperature was 36.6°C, the blood pressure 143/63 mm Hg, the pulse 66 beats per minute, the respiratory rate 18 breaths per minute, and the oxygen saturation 98% while the patient was breathing ambient air. He was alert and interactive. There was a facial droop on the left side. There was no effort against gravity in the left arm. The patient was able to lift the left leg off the bed for 1 to 2 seconds. He had a right gaze deviation that could not be overcome and mild dysarthria. The remainder of the examination was normal. A diagnosis of stroke was considered, and emergency CT angiography was performed.
Dr. Gupta: CT angiography showed no evidence of acute territorial infarction and no changes in cerebrovascular disease.
Dr. Chui: On repeat physical examination performed after CT angiography, the gaze deviation and dysarthria had resolved, and strength was normal. Mild facial paralysis was present.
A diagnosis was made.

Differential Diagnosis

Dr. Albert Y. Hung: This 79-year-old man initially presented with involuntary movements of the left shoulder and face without associated loss of consciousness. Diagnosis of an unusual movement disorder, especially one that is present episodically, can be challenging. Videos brought in by the patient can be very useful. 1 Most movement disorders result from abnormal functioning of extrapyramidal circuits involving the basal ganglia, rather than a specific neuroanatomical lesion, and the first step toward diagnosis is to identify the type of abnormal movements. 2
Four salient aspects of this patient’s involuntary movements can help in characterizing the movement disorder before generating a differential diagnosis. First, the movements were paroxysmal, lasting for short periods of time with resolution between episodes. Second, the movements were nonstereotyped, appearing randomly and variably. Third, the movements were restricted to the left side of his body throughout the course, localizing the disease process to the right cerebral hemisphere. Finally, the symptoms were progressive, increasing in both duration and frequency.

Movement Disorders

This patient had abnormal involuntary movements, symptoms indicative of a hyperkinetic movement disorder. Tremor, the most common hyperkinetic disorder, is unlikely because the patient did not have rhythmic movements. Dystonia is also unlikely, because he did not have sustained muscle contractions that were causing twisting or abnormal postures of the legs, arms, head, neck, or face. Although the patient initially described the movements as twitching, his later descriptions are not suggestive of myoclonus or tics, which manifest as sudden, rapid, recurrent movements.
This patient’s neurologist described the involuntary movements as “choreoathetoid” after reviewing a video of an episode. Chorea, athetosis, and ballism make up a spectrum of involuntary movements that often occur in combination. Chorea refers to involuntary movements that are “dancelike” — irregular, random, unintended, and flowing from one body part to another. When these movements are slow and writhing (with a lower amplitude) and involve the distal limbs, the term athetosis is used. The presence of both chorea and athetosis in the same patient is referred to as choreoathetosis. When the movements are fast and flinging (with a higher amplitude) and involve the proximal limbs, the term ballism is used. Although the description of this patient’s movements was not clearly suggestive of ballism, hemichorea and hemiballismus often occur together.
The term dyskinesia can refer to any abnormal movements and is often used to describe hyperkinetic disorders that are induced by specific drugs, such as tardive dyskinesia induced by dopamine antagonists or dyskinesia induced by levodopa in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Often, dyskinesia manifests as chorea or choreoathetoid movements, but chorea and dyskinesia are not synonymous. This patient appears to have involuntary dyskinesia with choreoathetosis as the primary phenomenology. Before constructing a differential diagnosis for dyskinesia in this patient, I will consider two conditions that mimic dyskinesia: seizures and functional movement disorder.

Seizures

Various movement disorders may be mistaken for seizures, although these movement disorders are not associated with EEG abnormalities during the episode. Patients with some forms of epilepsy may present with abnormal movements without other features that are typically associated with seizures, such as aura, change in responsiveness, incontinence, or a postictal state. 3,4 Seizures were initially suspected in this patient, and he was referred to the epilepsy clinic. Recurrent focal seizures were probably suspected because of the transient nature of the episodes. Initial MRI had shown a small abnormality in the right middle frontal gyrus, but this finding was not seen on follow-up imaging, which makes it unlikely to be related to the overall presentation. Baseline EEG had shown only brief left temporal slowing, without epileptiform abnormalities. The EEG was an interictal study, so the findings do not rule out seizures. However, the slowing was ipsilateral to the abnormal movements, so it is unlikely to be related to the episodes. In addition, the patient’s involuntary movements were nonstereotyped and nonrhythmic, which makes his presentation unlikely to be due to a seizure disorder.

Functional Movement Disorder

Because this patient’s movements diminished with the use of distraction techniques, a diagnosis of functional movement disorder was considered. Most cases of functional movement disorder begin abruptly after a trigger, such as a mild physical injury or illness; a psychological stressor can be present but is not required for diagnosis. Symptoms are typically most severe around the time of onset and may wax and wane over time. Although distractibility is a finding associated with functional disorders, abnormal movements that occur with nonfunctional syndromes can sometimes be suppressed by action or incorporated into voluntary movements in a manner that may appear distractible. Several clinical features in this patient make a diagnosis of functional disorder unlikely. Functional movement disorder is more common in women than in men, and the average age at onset is 40 years. 5 In addition, tremor is the most common clinical phenotype seen in patients with functional movement disorder; chorea or choreoathetosis, which was seen in this patient, is very unusual in patients with functional movement disorder. Overall, functional movement disorder is unlikely to explain this patient’s presentation.

Dyskinesia

Primary paroxysmal dyskinesia refers to a group of heterogeneous syndromes characterized by recurrent involuntary movements that occur episodically and abruptly, without loss of consciousness. 6 These disorders usually begin in childhood or young adulthood. Both the age of this patient and the described phenomenology make a diagnosis of primary paroxysmal dyskinesia unlikely.
The differential diagnosis in this case is therefore focused on causes of secondary dyskinesia, of which there are many. 7 MRI ruled out the presence of a mass lesion suggestive of cancer. The patient had no history of acute illness suggestive of a viral or other infectious encephalitis, and there was no history of trauma or exposure to drugs or other toxins. Although his daughter mentioned trouble with memory, there was no compelling history suggestive of a neurodegenerative disease.
A common metabolic cause of secondary dyskinesia is diabetic striatopathy, a syndrome involving the acute-to-subacute onset of chorea and ballism in the context of hyperglycemia. 8 This syndrome can occur as the initial manifestation of type 2 diabetes mellitus or as a complication of poorly controlled diabetes. Diabetic striatopathy is more likely to develop in women than in men, and the average age at onset is 70 years. Most patients present with hemichorea and hemiballismus, rather than bilateral symptoms. CT shows hyperdensity, and T1-weighted MRI shows hyperintensity, in the contralateral basal ganglia. However, this patient had no history of diabetes and had a normal blood glycated hemoglobin level, features that rule out a diagnosis of diabetic striatopathy.
Choreiform movements can also be a manifestation of autoimmune conditions. 9 This patient’s initial presentation with unilateral shoulder and face movements would have suggested the possibility of faciobrachial dystonic seizures associated with anti–leucine-rich, glioma-inactivated 1 (anti-LGI1) encephalitis. 10 This condition is often associated with hyponatremia, which was present in this patient. However, as the case evolved, leg involvement and sensory changes developed that would be atypical for anti-LGI1 encephalitis.
One key clue in this case is that the patient did not have an isolated movement disorder. In addition to motor symptoms, he had a variety of sensory symptoms involving both the left arm and the left leg. His first hospital admission was precipitated by an episode of unresponsiveness. The clinical event that led to his second presentation to the emergency department was distinctly different: an acute onset of speech difficulty accompanied by left hemiparesis and right gaze deviation that was worrisome for an acute right middle cerebral artery (MCA) syndrome. The symptoms resolved without intervention, which indicates that he may have had an acute transient ischemic attack (TIA). The most relevant imaging finding was severe cerebrovascular disease, including severe stenosis of the distal right CCA and proximal right ICA. Could this patient’s movement disorder be explained by a vascular lesion?

Limb-Shaking TIAs

Limb-shaking TIAs were first described by C. Miller Fisher in 1962. 11 In most case reports, these episodes are associated with high-grade stenosis of the ICA, which was seen in this patient. 12,13 The mechanism is thought to be cerebral hypoperfusion, and changes in posture or head position that decrease cerebral blood flow can precipitate these episodes. In this patient, the first episode of unresponsiveness that led to hospital admission occurred when he was sitting. He then had an acute episode involving right gaze preference that was provoked by exercise and was very suggestive of a TIA in the right MCA territory. These findings are highly suggestive of a diagnosis of limb-shaking TIAs, and I would refer this patient for emergency carotid endarterectomy.

Clinical Impression and Initial Management

Dr. Scott B. Silverman: When I evaluated this patient, his transient right gaze preference and left hemiparesis were consistent with a right MCA syndrome due to a TIA from symptomatic severe stenosis of the right ICA. The mechanism of this event was either artery-to-artery embolism or hypoperfusion. His previous, recurrent episodes of transient choreoathetosis on the left side that had occurred mainly while he was sitting, standing, or exercising were consistent with limb-shaking TIAs from hypoperfusion or low flow.
The pathogenesis of a low-flow state related to severe carotid stenosis resulting in limb-shaking TIAs is described in a small case series. 14 In six out of eight patients, the transient, stereotyped, involuntary movements were eliminated with carotid artery revascularization. Positional cerebral ischemia in patients without orthostatic hypotension has been described. 15
Treatment with atorvastatin was continued, the dose of aspirin was increased to 325 mg per day, and an intravenous heparin infusion was started. The strategy of permissive hypertension was used, with high blood pressure allowed to a maximum systolic blood pressure of 180 mm Hg. The patient was admitted to the stroke service, and carotid artery duplex ultrasonography was performed.
Dr. Gupta: Doppler ultrasonography of the carotid arteries (Figure 2) revealed markedly elevated Doppler flow velocities within the proximal right ICA. There was a parvus et tardus waveform in the distal right ICA, a finding indicative of low flow related to the more proximal high-grade stenosis. The Doppler waveform contours had poststenotic turbulence.
Figure 2
Doppler Ultrasound Image.
Dr. Silverman: The vascular surgery service was consulted, and the patient underwent right carotid endarterectomy.

Clinical Diagnosis

Limb-shaking transient ischemic attacks.

Dr. Albert Y. Hung’s Diagnosis

Limb-shaking transient ischemic attacks due to severe carotid stenosis, with secondary paroxysmal dyskinesia.

Pathological Discussion

Dr. Caroline F. Hilburn: The endarterectomy specimen included the carotid bifurcation and was notable for firm arterial walls, a finding consistent with calcification. On gross examination (Figure 3A), a large plaque was centered at the carotid bifurcation and protruded into the lumen, resulting in a maximal luminal stenosis of 80%. The plaque had an irregular and focally friable surface. On microscopic examination (Figure 3B), the plaque was characterized by extensive calcification. Some regions of the plaque had a smooth, healed fibrous cap, whereas other regions had an irregular surface suggestive of ulceration, which indicated potential sites of plaque rupture. Multiple smaller calcified plaques were present, affecting both branches of the artery.
Figure 3
Endarterectomy Specimen.

Pathological Diagnosis

Complex atherosclerotic plaque with portions of attached media.

Additional Management

Dr. Silverman: After the procedure, the patient had an uneventful recovery and was discharged home on the fifth hospital day. He was seen 1 month after discharge in the stroke prevention clinic. There had been no further episodes of involuntary movements or choreoathetosis and no stroke or TIA. The patient continues to take aspirin, atorvastatin, and antihypertensive medications.

Final Diagnosis

Limb-shaking transient ischemic attacks.
药品使用说明
打开京东APP
实惠又轻松
打开京东APP
京ICP备11041704号
京公网安备 11000002000088号