京东健康互联网医院
网站导航

达拉特旗中蒙医医院胆囊结石伴慢性胆囊炎专家

简介:

达拉特旗中蒙医医院,现发展成为一所集医疗、预防、保健、教学、康复为一体的以中蒙医为特色,中、蒙、西相结合的二级甲等综合性医院,建筑面积11946平方米。一般是由长期存在的胆囊结石所致的胆囊慢性炎症;或者由急性胆囊炎反复发生,迁延而来。,胆囊结石 胆囊结石是慢性胆囊炎的主要病因,结石可导致胆囊管反复梗阻,并造成胆囊黏膜损伤,出现反复的胆囊壁病变反应和胆囊功能障碍。 细菌感染 当胆囊或胆管出现结石嵌顿、梗阻时,则可能导致肠源性细菌感染。常见病原菌包括大肠埃希菌等。 其他因素 低纤维、高能量饮食可增加胆汁胆固醇饱和度,利于结石形成。 某些药物可导致胆囊结石形成,如头孢曲松、避孕药等。 体重快速减少,如不合理的减肥方法,可能易导致胆囊结石形成。,胆囊,治疗方法包括一般治疗、药物治疗和手术治疗。,慢性胃炎 相似点:均可出现腹痛、腹胀等。 不同点:慢性胃炎可表现为上腹隐痛、反酸、嗳气等,可通过胃镜或超声检查鉴别诊断。 胃食管反流病 相似点:均可出现腹痛等。 不同点:胃食管反流病表现为胸骨后疼痛、反酸及烧心,多在饱餐后发生,餐后平卧加重,站立或半卧位减轻。可通过胃镜检查及食管pH监测或超声检查鉴别。 胆囊癌 相似点:均可出现恶心、呕吐等。 不同点:胆囊癌早期症状与慢性胆囊炎相似,但多为胆囊无痛性肿大,B超检查可鉴别。,禁忌喝酒、吃辛辣食物,实验室检查 血常规:通过检查白细胞计数、中性粒细胞比例等,可以判断是否有细菌感染,辅助诊断。 影像学检查 B超检查:常规腹部超声检查是诊断慢性胆囊炎最常用、最有价值的检查方法,可以判断出胆囊的大小、胆囊壁增厚、是否有结石等。 CT检查:能良好地显示胆囊壁增厚,但不能显示X线检查阴性的结石。CT检查对慢性胆囊炎的诊断价值与腹部超声相似。 磁共振成像(MRI):MRI检查在评估胆囊壁纤维化、胆囊壁缺血、胆囊周围组织水肿、胆囊周围脂肪堆积等方面均优于CT检查。在腹部超声检查显示胆囊病变不清晰时,可选用MRI检查。 注意事项:检查时应避免佩戴金属首饰或穿着带有金属纽扣配件的衣物。,。

团结 副主任医师

大内科,理疗科

好评 -
接诊量 -
平均等待 -
擅长:大内科,理疗科
更多服务
王勇芹 副主任医师

颈椎病,腰椎间盘突出,肩周炎,面瘫,膝关节滑膜炎,膝关节退行性病,风湿骨痛,痛风各种痛症

好评 -
接诊量 -
平均等待 -
擅长:颈椎病,腰椎间盘突出,肩周炎,面瘫,膝关节滑膜炎,膝关节退行性病,风湿骨痛,痛风各种痛症
更多服务
保鲁尔 副主任医师

肩周、腰腿,心身医学

好评 -
接诊量 -
平均等待 -
擅长:肩周、腰腿,心身医学
更多服务
韩娟娟 主治医师

擅长消化系统疾病,功能性消化不良,消化性溃疡,慢性胃肠炎等相关疾病

好评 -
接诊量 -
平均等待 -
擅长:擅长消化系统疾病,功能性消化不良,消化性溃疡,慢性胃肠炎等相关疾病
更多服务
刘交其 主治医师

呼吸,消化,心脑血管,内分泌等

好评 -
接诊量 -
平均等待 -
擅长:呼吸,消化,心脑血管,内分泌等
更多服务
高改峰 主治医师

颈肩腰腿痛,(强直性脊柱炎、腰椎间盘突出症、肾虚腰痛、寒痹、四肢痛、眉棱骨痛、椎管狭窄;养血舒筋、强壮筋骨、骨节痛)、肩周炎(祛风止痛、温经通络)、膝关节炎、踝关节扭伤。

好评 -
接诊量 -
平均等待 -
擅长:颈肩腰腿痛,(强直性脊柱炎、腰椎间盘突出症、肾虚腰痛、寒痹、四肢痛、眉棱骨痛、椎管狭窄;养血舒筋、强壮筋骨、骨节痛)、肩周炎(祛风止痛、温经通络)、膝关节炎、踝关节扭伤。
更多服务
郭增光 主治医师

心脑血管及心律失常,糖尿病,甲状腺疾病,肺炎,慢性胃炎及胃肠功能稳乱等常见疾病。

好评 -
接诊量 -
平均等待 -
擅长:心脑血管及心律失常,糖尿病,甲状腺疾病,肺炎,慢性胃炎及胃肠功能稳乱等常见疾病。
更多服务
张鹏春 住院医师

心脑血管疾病,糖尿病,脾胃消化不良,慢性胃炎,腰椎间盘突出,颈椎病,强制性脊柱炎,风湿类风湿性关节炎,骨性关节炎。

好评 -
接诊量 -
平均等待 -
擅长:心脑血管疾病,糖尿病,脾胃消化不良,慢性胃炎,腰椎间盘突出,颈椎病,强制性脊柱炎,风湿类风湿性关节炎,骨性关节炎。
更多服务
邬宇慧 住院医师

内科相关疾病

好评 100%
接诊量 5
平均等待 -
擅长:内科相关疾病
更多服务

患友问诊

36岁的患者发现自己有肝内胆管结石,想了解如何治疗。
28
2024-10-31 15:27:17
我妈妈做了胆结石切除手术后,吃什么都拉肚子,怎么办?
6
2024-10-31 15:27:17
我有胆囊炎,后背疼,消化不良。请问如何治疗?
44
2024-10-31 15:27:17
53岁患者被诊断出患有胆囊炎,目前正在疼痛中,询问是否可以服用胆宁片。
1
2024-10-31 15:27:17
67岁女性患者患有慢性胆囊炎2年,偶有钝疼,B超检查胆壁增厚,平时有吃消炎药,但效果不明显,想知道哪种药比较有效?
11
2024-10-31 15:27:17
我有慢性胆囊炎,右上腹隐痛,最近左边肋骨也开始疼痛,想知道是不是胆囊炎引起的?
5
2024-10-31 15:27:17
70岁以上老人有脂肪肝和慢性胆囊炎,想了解熊胆粉的使用情况和是否适合自己的症状。
27
2024-10-31 15:27:17
我想了解慢性胆囊炎的治疗方法,是否可以使用消石利胆胶囊?
5
2024-10-31 15:27:17
我有慢性胆囊炎,最近感冒了,体温36.8,身上有点酸痛。京东的医生让我吃快克和另一种药,但我不确定是否可以同时服用。
14
2024-10-31 15:27:17
我最近睡眠和食欲都不好,担心自己可能有胆囊结石,想了解一下中医的治疗方法。
61
2024-10-31 15:27:17

科普文章

#胆囊结石伴慢性胆囊炎#胆囊结石#胆囊炎#胆囊结石
842

最近有很多朋友向我咨询关于胆囊结石和胆囊炎的一些问题,我发现他们许多人缺乏对胆囊的基本常识,当然更不清楚胆囊疾病进一步发展会造成的严重后果。因此,普及胆囊及相关疾病的医学常识,能够使更多人认识胆囊疾病,及早的去医疗机构就诊,采取有效的治疗方法,预防疾病的进一步发展。

 
1、胆囊的解剖特点
 
胆囊形态呈梨形,位于肝脏胆囊窝内,是胆囊管的终末膨大部分,长8-12cm,宽3-5cm,容量40-60ml。胆囊分为底、体、颈、管四部分。胆囊颈部呈囊性扩大,医学上称为Hartmann袋,胆囊结石常滞留于此。
 
2、胆囊的生理功能
 
胆囊是贮存和浓缩胆汁的囊状器官,很多人顾名思义,误以为胆汁是由胆囊产生的;其实胆汁主要是由肝细胞分泌的,占3/4,另外还有胆管细胞分泌的黏液物质,占1/4;胆汁的分泌是每日每刻都在进行的,正常成人每日分泌量约800-1200ml,主要作用是促进油脂类物质(脂肪、胆固醇和脂溶性维生素等)的吸收。胆囊体积虽小,但24小时能接纳约500ml的胆汁,并可将胆汁浓缩5-10倍而存储于胆囊内。当进食时,受不同食物的刺激,胆囊平滑肌收缩将胆汁排出,参与油脂类物质的消化吸收,每次排胆运动完成后,仍会有约15%的胆汁留存于胆囊内。
 
3、胆囊结石的主要成分是什么,又是如何形成的呢?
 
胆囊结石主要为胆固醇结石或以胆固醇为主的混合性结石和黑色素结石。但胆囊结石的成因非常复杂,受多种因素影响。一般来说,胆石的成因多系胆汁滞留、代谢障碍和胆道感染等因素综合作用所致,可以说任何影响胆固醇与胆汁酸和磷脂浓度比例和造成胆汁瘀滞的因素均能导致结石的形成。一般认为胆汁滞留是各种胆石形成的首要条件,假如我们将胆汁比喻成黄河之水的话,如果黄河下游阻塞,河水无法入海,则积聚在河道内,那么混合在河水内的沙子则沉落在河底,形成胆泥,在胆囊的不断收缩运动下,这些胆泥便逐渐形成大小、形态不同的胆囊结石。
 
4、什么是胆囊炎,胆囊炎症又是如何发生的?
 
胆囊炎是胆囊管梗阻和细菌感染引起的胆囊炎症,主要原因为结石梗阻,约占95%,我们称之为胆囊结石性胆囊炎;而约5%的患者胆囊内无结石,我们称为非结石性胆囊炎。胆汁滞留和细菌感染是胆囊炎发生时互为影响的两大因素,当胆囊管受结石或其它因素梗阻时,胆汁流出障碍,细菌则在积聚的胆汁内繁殖,引起胆囊炎症,其主要的致病菌为大肠埃希菌、粪肠球菌、铜绿假单胞菌等。
 
5、胆囊炎有哪些表现,我们该如何去判断是否患了胆囊炎?
 
由于胆囊炎的病因、病变程度不同,以及有无胆囊结石的存在,其症状表现也有所不同。胆囊炎主要的临床表现如下:
 
①上腹部疼痛,以右上腹为著。开始时仅有上腹胀痛不适,逐渐发展至阵发性绞痛。腹痛常于夜间发作,尤其以晚十点至凌晨三时左右发作最为常见,与胆囊节律性运动有关,饱餐或进食油腻食物常是诱发原因。典型的临床表现常有右肩、背部放射痛,是协助判断的重要表现。
 
②恶心、呕吐,约60%以上的患者伴有恶心,1/3以上的患者伴有呕吐,特别是疼痛加剧时更为明显。胆囊炎症时胆汁排出不畅,无法促进食物的消化吸收,以及疼痛时迷走神经兴奋性增强,是引起恶心、呕吐的主要原因。
 
③发热、寒战,胆囊炎大多仅有轻至中度的发热,一般不超过38.5℃,常无寒战、高热,若出现这类症状提示病情较重,已发展至化脓性胆囊炎、坏疽性胆囊炎、胆囊穿孔或合并有胆管炎。
 
④腹部体征,患者呈急性病容,表情痛苦,有的烦躁不安,辗转反侧或呈被动体 位,以缓解疼痛。典型的体征为右上腹肋缘下胆囊区压痛、腹肌紧张,拒按。部分患者可于右上腹触及肿大胆囊。
 
 
6、怀疑胆囊炎,需要做哪些检查?
 
①血液检查 包括血常规、肝功能检查。血常规检查约85%的患者可有白细胞水平升高,中性粒细胞百分百增加,但老年人可不增加;肝功能检查可有谷丙转氨酶、谷草转氨酶、碱性磷酸酶的升高,胆红素则一般升高不明显。
 
②影像学检查 腹部彩超是胆囊结石、胆囊炎时的首选检查,诊断率高,价格便宜;上腹部CT检查,可使医生直观的了解胆囊结石及胆囊炎症情况,预估手术困难情况,但需要指出的是胆囊结石因主要成分为胆固醇,CT影像下不显影,我们称之为“阴性结石”,而当结石成分中含有钙元素时才可在CT图像中看到结石,所以不要以为CT检查没有发现结石就排除胆囊结石的诊断;磁共振检查(MRCP),非必须的影像学检查,但部分患者存在胆管变异,磁共振检查可行胆道成形,了解胆道走形。若患者拟行手术治疗,且经济条件允许建议完善该项检查,能够降低术中胆管损伤风险。
 
7、胆囊结石、胆囊炎该如何治疗?
 
对于单纯胆囊炎的患者,如症状轻微,可采取内科对症治疗,包括清淡饮食、规律饮食、改变饮食结构、口服消炎利胆药物等,多可缓解症状,甚至痊愈。若为急性胆囊炎,症状较重,需住院治疗,给予禁饮食、抗感染、解痉止痛、抑酸护胃、营养支持及补液等对症治疗;如果反复急性胆囊炎发作,则需行手术治疗,以免酿成严重后果。目前对于胆囊结石的治疗医学界已达成共识,即无论胆囊结石大小,原则上均应行胆囊切除手术,以防止诱发急性胆囊炎或引发其他严重的并发症,如急性胰腺炎、胆囊癌变等。
 
8、胆囊结石和胆囊炎的手术方法有哪些?
 
①腹腔镜下胆囊切除术(LC) 即人们常说的“微创手术”,该术式创伤小,恢复快,术后3-5日即可出院,甚至有些医院开设了日间病房,术后1日即可出院。
 
②开腹手术 适合那些存在腔镜手术禁忌,而又需手术治疗的患者,如既往有过腹部大手术史,预估腹腔粘连较重,或胆囊炎症较重,腔镜手术难以完成的患者。
 
③超声引导下经皮经肝胆囊穿刺置管引流术(PTGD) 可降低胆囊内压,缓解腹痛症状,急性期过后再择期手术。适用于病情危重又不适合急诊行胆囊切除术的患者。
 
9、腹腔镜下保胆取石手术可行吗?
 
 
随着腹腔镜下胆囊切除术在国内的逐步开展和成熟,国内逐步发展出了腹腔镜下保胆取石的手术方式,并曾一度为大家所推崇。但随后不断有临床科研报道这种手术方式的结石高复发率,就目前的医学技术而言,保胆取石手术是被国内主流医学界所摒弃的一种术式。美、英等国家则不提倡在没有充分理论依据的前提下、也不允许不经充分论证的情况下开展保胆取石手术。那么为什么保胆取石手术具有高复发率呢,主要是因为保胆取石手术破坏了胆囊壁的完整性,术后创面会是结石形成的诱因,而致使胆囊结石高复发率。但看待问题不能片面的去理解一种事物,随着医学技术的不断进步及医疗设备的不断更新换代、普及和成熟,经胆囊管保胆取石,而不去破坏胆囊壁的完整性,那么保胆取石手术仍是具有发展前景的术式,但这种发展路程将会是漫长的。而就目前而言,不应仅为去取悦自身的心理需求、盲目的以自身局限的医学认知、而不听从医生的建议而要求医生实施保胆取石手术,可能会给自身带来更多的伤痛、恶变风险和长期服用预防结石形成药物的经济负担,当应谨而又慎。
 
10、胆囊结石为什么非要行胆囊切除手术,非手术治疗不行吗?
 
这也是大多数胆囊结石患者的疑问,答案是不行!胆囊结石的存在,会反复摩擦胆囊壁,破坏胆囊壁的完整性和屏障功能,导致胆囊炎症的反复发作,若结石导致胆囊管的完全梗阻,则腹痛更为剧烈,若梗阻不能尽早解除,会发展成胆囊化脓、胆囊坏疽和胆囊穿孔。若胆囊结石落入胆总管内,可形成胆总管结石,若日后行手术治疗,需行胆总管切开取石术,增加手术的复杂性;若结石将胆总管完全阻塞,则可能造成急性梗阻性化脓性胆管炎,会危及生命。若结石阻塞胰管的出口,可致胆源性胰腺炎,这也是大部分胰腺炎的发病病因。最为严重的是,长期的胆囊结石,尤其是超过十年的胆囊结石,可致使胆囊萎缩、胆囊癌变,最终追悔莫及。因为胆囊癌是全身恶性程度最高的一种恶性肿瘤,无论手术与否,预后极差,因此胆囊癌最佳的治疗方式重在预防,及时行胆囊切除手术。
 
11、胆囊炎时可服用哪些药物治疗?
 
①消炎利胆片(具体以药物说明书为准)
 
适应症:清热、祛湿、利胆。用于肝胆湿热所致的胁痛、口苦;急性胆囊炎、胆管炎见上述证候者。
 
用法用量:口服,一次6片,一日3次。
 
②舒胆片(具体以药物说明书为准)
 
适应症:清热化湿、利胆排石、行气止痛。用于肝胆湿热,黄疸胁痛,发热口苦,尿赤便燥;胆囊炎、胆道感染、胆石症见上述证候者。
 
用法用量:口服。一次5-6片,一日3次,小儿酌减,或遵医嘱。
 
③胆宁片(具体以药物说明书为准)
 
适应症:疏肝利胆,清热通下。用于肝郁气滞,湿热未清所致右上腹隐隐作痛、食入作胀、胃纳不香、嗳气、便秘;慢性胆囊炎见上述症候者。 
 
用法用量:饭后服,一次5片,一日3次。
 
④熊去氧胆酸胶囊(优思弗)(具体以药物说明书为准)
 
适应症:1. 固醇性胆囊结石-必须是X射线能穿透的结石,同时胆囊收缩功能须正常;2. 胆汁郁积性肝病(如:原发性胆汁性肝硬化);3. 胆汁反流性胃炎。
 
用法用量:按时用少量水送服。按体重每日剂量为10mg/kg, 即:

 

 
 
溶石治疗:一般需6~24个月,服用12个月后结石未见变小者,停止服用。治疗结果根据每6个月进行超声波或X射线检查判断。
 
注意:该药需在医生指导下应用。
 
12、胆囊结石、胆囊炎患者日常的注意事项有哪些?
 
①一日三餐好,胆囊无烦恼
 
不吃早餐,或者饮食无规律,会导致空腹时间过长,胆囊缺乏食物的刺激,导致胆汁排出减少,而胆囊的浓缩功能不受影响,使胆汁中的胆固醇处于过饱和状态,易结晶析出,形成胆囊结石。
 
②暴饮暴食不可取,餐餐进食别太饱
 
饱餐和暴饮暴食会刺激胆汁的大量分泌,促使胆囊强烈收缩,可诱发胆绞痛和急性胆囊炎症。因此应少量多餐,细嚼慢咽,勿过饱,使胆囊规律的排出胆汁。
 
③饮食记得要清淡,油腻食物少入口
 
大量进食高脂饮食,如富含饱和脂肪酸和胆固醇的动物内脏、肥肉、蛋黄、油炸食品等,会刺激胆囊的收缩,增加胆囊疾病发作的危险。大量进食油脂类食物,会影响胆汁各成分的结构,胆汁酸分泌减少,胆固醇及胆色素增加,利于胆囊结石的形成。另外,高脂饮食还会导致胆固醇与脂肪酸呈过饱和状态,促进结晶、析出和结石的形成。
 
④忌辛辣食物和“发物”
 
中医讲的“发物”和辛辣食物,如辣椒、花椒、花椒、芥末等能够刺激胆囊的收缩,并使oddi氏括约肌痉挛,使胆结石易于嵌顿,胆汁排出不畅,诱发胆囊炎症的发生。因此,患有胆囊结石、胆囊炎的患者应忌食辛辣食物。
 
⑤多饮水,降低碳水化合物的摄入
 
多饮白开水可以降低胆汁的浓度,降低结石形成的风险,建议每日饮水量应在2000ml以上。若常喝碳酸饮料、含糖的果汁以及甜食,会使胰岛素分泌增加,加速胆固醇的积累,造成胆汁内胆固醇、胆汁酸、磷脂的比例失调。另外,进食过多的糖类食物,血液中的葡萄糖浓度升高,会通过三羧酸循环转变为脂肪酸,使血脂升高,有利于结石的形成。
 
⑥多吃新鲜蔬菜和水果,增加膳食纤维。
 
新鲜蔬菜和水果富含多种维生素和微量元素,能够调节机体能量代谢和新陈代谢,降低体内胆固醇和胆汁酸浓度,降低胆囊结石形成的风险。另外,适当的增加膳食纤维可刺激肠道蠕动,也有利于预防胆囊炎的发作。
 
⑦改变烹饪方式
 
炒菜用油应以植物油为主,如花生油、大豆油、橄榄油等,少食或不食动物油。烹饪方式尽可能采用煮、炖和清蒸的方式,而少油炸、油煎的方式,因为在高温的油脂中,含有丙烯醛的裂解产物会增加,可刺激胆道,引起胆道痉挛的发作。
 
⑧戒烟、戒酒,健康生活方式
 
香烟、酒可以刺激胃酸的分泌,促进胆囊的收缩和oddi氏括约肌痉挛,胆汁排出受阻,诱发胆囊炎症及胆绞痛。而且吸烟和饮酒会增加肺癌和肝硬化的发病率,因此应戒烟戒酒,提倡健康生活方式。
 
⑨定期复查很重要,及时治疗效果好
 
胆囊结石和胆囊炎的患者应坚持定期复查,至少每半年或一年复查一次腹部彩超,病情变化及时复查。这样可以很及时的了解胆囊结石的变化,及早的发现有无胆囊癌变,避免后悔终生的惨剧发生。
#胆囊结石#胆囊结石伴慢性胆囊炎#胆囊结石嵌顿
109

胆囊癌的发病与胆囊结石有关。胆囊腺瘤性息肉也有发展成癌的倾向。胆囊癌好发于体部和底部,80%为腺癌,其次为鳞癌,以淋巴转移为主,也可直接肝内转移,很少有血行转移。

早期无特殊临床表现,与胆囊炎、胆囊结石的症状相似。后期出现黄疸、发热、右上腹肿块和腹腔积液。当胆囊结石嵌于胆囊颈部,可导致囊内压力增高,加之胆汁酸刺激胆囊黏膜,引起充血、水肿、渗出即急性胆囊炎。

若胆囊结石长期嵌顿而又不引起继发性感染,导致胆囊积脓。较小的胆囊结石可排入胆总管,若嵌顿于胆总管下端壶腹部,会导致急性梗阻性化脓性胆管炎和全身感染。较大的结石通常不会嵌于胆囊颈部,更少会排入胆总管,临床上常无症状或临床症状较轻。

胆囊结石症的治疗原则是手术切除病变胆囊,而对于无症状的静止的胆囊结石,一般可不施行手术。

#慢性结石性胆囊炎#胆囊结石伴慢性胆囊炎
428

患者朋友大家好,今天和大家分享的科普知识是胆囊炎患者的饮食禁忌问题,我们大家都知道胆囊炎最常见的发病诱因就是不恰当的饮食,尤其是每到过年过节期间,正是亲戚朋友聚会,聚餐的密集时期。这时很多慢性胆囊炎患者稍微不注意饮食就会造成胆囊炎的急性发作,引起腹痛,腹胀,恶心呕吐等症状,严重者还要住院治疗。那么慢性胆囊炎患者日常的饮食要如何注意呢,今天我们一起来学习一下。

慢性胆囊炎患者大部分合并有胆囊结石的存在,一旦结石发生嵌顿或者堵塞胆管的情况,就会再次胆囊内胆汁排泄不畅,诱发急性炎症的发生。一般来说,很多胆囊结石的患者在主要饮食,规律生活的情况下,确实可以控制胆囊结石不反复发作。但是,若出现以下饮食情况发生胆囊炎的几率非常大。

  • 过饱的饮食。尤其是遇到自己比较可口的饭菜,胆囊炎患者在吃饱后又多吃了一些食物,这就会造成胃肠道和胆道功能的负担加重。这会引起胆汁和胃肠液分泌增多,造成胆道的压力急剧升高。又发急性胆囊炎的表现。
  • 高脂饮食。有的患者虽然没有吃饱,但是吃了过多的脂肪类的食物。油腻的食物也会造成胆汁分泌增加,而且长期高脂饮食会造成新发胆囊结石的形成,引起胆囊炎反复发作的表现。所以患者要尽量少吃猪头肉,红烧肉,烧鸡,烧鹅,烤鸭,牛排等热量较高,又不好消化的食物。

以上就是今天的内容,欢迎大家留言咨询,我们随时交流。

#慢性结石性胆囊炎#胆囊结石伴慢性胆囊炎
388

首先来了解下什么是胆囊炎吧。

 

胆囊炎怎么来的?

胆囊是一个囊状结构,主要功能就是贮存胆汁,而胆汁的主要作用是消化脂肪。当有食物,尤其是油腻食物刺激的时候,胆囊就会收缩,排出胆汁以消化食物。

 

急性胆囊炎反复发作,或是胆囊结石长期存在,均可导致胆囊功能异常,引起慢性胆囊炎。慢性胆囊炎又分为慢性结石性胆囊炎和慢性非结石性胆囊炎两种,其中以慢性结石性胆囊炎比较多见。

 

1. 慢性结石性胆囊炎

 

如果胆囊收缩功能异常,容易导致胆汁排出不畅形成结石。胆囊结石的存在,会加重胆汁排出不畅。胆囊里的胆汁越积越多,胆囊的压力随之越来越大,加上结石对胆囊壁的反复摩擦,胆囊壁就会出现炎症。

 

2. 慢性非结石性胆囊炎

 

正常胆汁里是没有细菌的,当胆囊梗阻、胆汁排出不畅时,肠道里的细菌就可能进入到胆囊,引起胆囊发炎。如果胆囊内压力剧增或细菌大量繁殖,就会引起急性胆囊炎发作。

 

此外,胆囊缺血(全身性疾病、使用缩血管药物)、饮食不当(大量摄入油腻食物、暴饮暴食、过度节食)也可引起胆囊功能异常,诱发慢性胆囊炎出现。

 

不吃脂肪,可不可行?

了解了胆囊炎的发病原因后,一些患者就理解为了「吃脂肪 = 排胆汁 = 诱发胆囊炎发作」,因此就会吃类似「清水煮白菜」这类无脂饮食。

 

这样其实是不对的!

 

虽然高脂饮食会明显刺激胆囊收缩加重腹痛,但平时适量进食脂肪不会诱发或者加重胆囊炎。相反,适量的脂肪摄入会刺激胆囊正常的收缩,使胆囊内的胆汁及时排空,减少胆汁瘀积,避免形成胆结石、加重胆囊炎。

 

此外,脂肪也是人体必需的营养物质之一,缺少脂肪的摄入,会逐渐出现乏力、记忆力下降、免疫力下降、凝血功能异常等表现。

 

如果慢性胆囊炎病人因饮食不当、劳累、细菌感染等原因,诱发胆囊炎急性发作,出现明显腹痛、发热甚至皮肤变黄等症状时,应及时到医院就诊进行治疗。

 

慢性胆囊炎患者该如何吃?

1. 蛋白质量要适量

 

适量的蛋白质可促进胆囊收缩,有利于胆汁的排出及疾病的恢复。

 

慢性胆囊炎的患者对蛋白的要求,与正常人群相当或稍高,每天推荐蛋白质摄入量为 80~100 g。

 

2. 脂肪和胆固醇的摄入要少

 

脂肪和胆固醇越多,越容易刺激胆囊收缩加重腹痛;而且,脂肪和胆固醇会让胆汁变得粘稠,更容易形成结石。

 

每天脂肪摄入量控制在 40~50 g,胆固醇摄入量每天应少于 300 mg。

 

3. 多吃新鲜蔬菜水果、补充膳食纤维

 

富含膳食纤维的蔬菜水果除了能补充维生素外,还能减少胆结石的形成、减少胆固醇吸收、减轻胆囊炎的症状。

 

4. 适量增加饮水量

 

多喝水,可稀释胆汁,促进胆汁排出,减少胆结石形成机会。

 

5. 合理烹调

 

宜采用煮、蒸、炖、焖等方法,减少煎、炸、烤等烹饪方式。

 

烹饪用油选用植物油,如花生油、玉米油、葵花籽油、橄榄油等。

 

6. 其他

 

少吃多餐,定时定量,避免暴饮暴食,戒烟戒酒。

 

慢性胆囊炎的饮食常见问题

1. 哪些食物要少吃?

 

高脂高胆固醇的食物,如肥肉、蛋黄、蟹黄、动物内脏等。

 

辛辣或刺激性食物及调味料,如辣椒、花椒、芥末、咖喱等。

 

油炸、膨化食品。

 

酒、浓茶和咖啡。

 

2. 鸡蛋、牛奶、瘦肉还能不能吃?

 

一个鸡蛋中的蛋白质大概有 7 g,一盒 250 mL 牛奶的蛋白质大概是 7.5 g,1 两瘦肉的蛋白质大概 5 g 左右。因此,按照慢性胆囊炎要求每天蛋白质供应量为 80~100 g 来计算,其实慢性胆囊炎的病人可以像常人一样,甚至比常人摄入更多的蛋白质。

 

但这里要提醒一下,大米、面粉这类平常食物中也是含有蛋白质的,所以,胆囊炎病人也不能拼命补充蛋白质,增加肠胃负担。

 

然而,鸡蛋中还有一个问题:胆固醇。

 

一个鸡蛋中大概含胆固醇 200 mg,而慢性胆囊炎患者的胆固醇摄入量限制在 300 mg 以下,因此,每天一个鸡蛋的摄入量对于大多数人是没有问题的。但如果一个鸡蛋吃下去,就会引起腹痛,那么还是建议少吃。

 

3. 炒菜可不可以放油?

 

平时我们用的植物油,油比水轻,所以 1 mL 植物油也就含脂肪 0.9~1 g。慢性胆囊炎患者每天脂肪摄入量控制在 40~50 g,因此,胆囊炎不吃油明显是错误的!

 

炒菜可以放油,只是要注意要少放一些,而且要注意平均分配至三餐,避免单次摄入过多的脂肪,诱发胆囊炎急性发作。

#胆囊结石伴慢性胆囊炎#胆囊结石伴胆囊炎#胆囊结石伴急性胆囊炎(胆石症伴急性胆囊炎)
11

随着胆囊结石伴胆囊炎发病率的升高,越来越多的病人需要行手术治疗。很多病人在选择手术治疗的同时,也产生了这样的疑虑,胆囊切掉以后对身体影响是不是很大呀?我很年轻,能不能选择不切除胆囊,就把结石去除呀?

面对这样的疑虑,我只想说,部分病人可以选择腹腔镜保胆取石术,但是选择这种手术方式的病人指征非常严格,大部分病人并不适合保胆,需要行腹腔镜胆囊切除术,具体还是需要医生来综合评估。那么哪些情况适合行保胆手术,我来向大家简单介绍一下。

主要考虑以下几个方面:

  • 胆囊结石合并胆囊炎未引起明显的腹痛或者腹胀症状,或者症状轻微。胆囊急性炎症期不适合保胆。
  • B 超提示胆囊结石数目尽量在 3 个以内,胆囊壁光滑,没有增厚。
  • 脂肪餐试验提示胆囊收缩功能正常。
  • 手术中发现胆囊形态正常,胆道镜明确胆囊粘膜面正常,结石可以取干净,胆囊管通畅,可见胆汁反流。
  • 病人有保胆意愿,可以接受结石复发,胆囊炎再次发作风险。

病症: 胃癌 恶性黑色素瘤

患者:李女士

年龄:70岁

罹患癌症,毫无疑问对每个人都是重大打击。而如果一位患者不幸同时罹患两种癌症,我们可以想象得出他的心情会是怎样的沉重。

但时至今日,癌症早已不再是什么“不治之症”,很多良好的治疗方法,可帮助患者迈过重重困境,预后得到极大提升。

不仅如此,在医疗全球化的今天,中国患者也能通过“海外二诊”服务,快速触达到国际权威专家资源,为自己的治疗保驾护航!

今天的案例主人公李女士,正是一位“海外二诊”的受益者。我们来一起看看她的故事。*为保护隐私,文中患者个人信息均已经脱敏处理。

70岁的李女士在去年年底,因脚底疼痛去医院看病,结果发现脚后跟有一个1厘米的黑色肿物。医生判断是冻疮,于是开了点外用药,李女士也就没有再放在心上。

大概4个月后,真正的噩梦降临:李女士通过影像检查,被诊断为胃癌,而且有了淋巴结转移。 她还出现了多次呕血,病情非常危急。很快,医生为她实施了全胃切除。令人意想不到的是,几天后通过检查,医生发现李女士后脚跟的肿物竟然也是癌症——恶性黑色素瘤。于是大概2个月后,医生又切除了她的足底肿瘤。 

为了降低复发风险,李女士开始了3个周期的化疗联合免疫治疗(替吉奥联合纳武单抗)。

虽然该做的都已做完,但对于李女士来说,恐惧感还远未被消除。因为癌症最令人恐惧的,是其具有“复发转移”的能力 。一旦癌症再次袭来,李女士不知道自己该如何应对。另外,两种癌症的治疗以及术后辅助药物治疗,也让李女士遭遇了一些副作用。比如腹泻、味觉障碍还有体重明显下降的问题。这些对于已经70岁的李女士来说,都很影响生活质量,所以迫切需要解决。

在本次的国际专家“海外二诊”服务中,李女士预约的是来自日本某知名综合性医院肿瘤中心的外科部长医生,他的专长领域既包括肿瘤外科,又包括各类癌症药物疗法、姑息治疗,是一位“内外兼修”的权威专家。在充分了解了李女士既往的病情和治疗经过后,医生很快通过远程会诊的方式,为患者详细解答了当前她的所有问题。

1、 未来如果转移或复发了该怎么办?  

医生:假如您未来不幸出现转移或复发,那么化疗是核心治疗手段。对于单发的孤立转移灶,可以选择手术、放疗来进行局部治疗。

具体化疗方案选择,我按使用的先后顺序列出了3类,当前面的方案失效后,可更换为后面的方案。

一类方案:化疗联合/不联合免疫方案  

  • CAPOX (卡培他滨+奥沙利铂)±O药(即免疫药物纳武单抗)
  • SOX (替吉奥+奥沙利铂)±O药
  • FOLFOX (5-FU+奥沙利铂)±O药

二类方案:化疗联合/不联合抗血管药物方案  

  • Taxane (紫杉醇/白蛋白结合型紫杉醇/多西紫杉醇)±雷莫芦单抗

三类方案:化疗方案  

  • 曲氟尿苷/盐酸替吡嘧啶
  • 伊立替康

  2、N K细胞疗法是否对我有帮助?副作用是否可控?   X医生:目前尚没有证据表明NK细胞疗法对癌症有效,因此不予推荐。

3、口服替吉奥会腹泻,是否需要调整方案?   II/III期胃癌患者术后采用辅助治疗方案,分别为:

  • 替吉奥口服 1 年(口服 4 周,停药 2 周,共 8 个疗程或口服 2 周,停药 1 周,共 16个疗程)
  • CAPOX (卡培他滨+奥沙利铂) 共半年(每 3 周一次,共 8 个疗程)
  • SOX (替吉奥+奥沙利铂) 共半年(每 3 周一次,共 8 个疗程)

这三种方案中,替吉奥方案和CAPOX方案等效,但SOX要优于替吉奥。另外,胃癌术后直接使用纳武单抗免疫治疗无意义。

替吉奥确实会出现腹泻等代表性不良反应,患者可以考虑对症治疗,比如调节肠道的药物、止泻药等缓解副作用。如果副作用太严重,那么可以考虑减少药物剂量。

替吉奥的标准用药剂量为120mg,但用量低于80mg无法达到预期效果。如果当前患者用药为100mg,那么为了降低副作用,可以减少剂量到80mg;但如果目前剂量已经是80mg,则无法进一步降低剂量,此时考虑更换方案为CAPOX方案替代。 如果不良反应严重到干扰日常生活,则患者可以选择停药,持续观察病情变化。

对于无淋巴结转移的II期B和II其C的患者,可选择使用1年帕博丽珠单抗免疫治疗。

4 、术后患者很瘦,味觉障碍,如何调理改善?   通常,手术后患者体重会减轻20%左右。这是患者消化吸收能力低下、促食欲的胃肠激素减少引起的。大约6个月到1年时间,患者可以恢复正常。

味觉障碍可能是抗癌药的副作用引起的,也可能是饮食减少导致缺乏锌等微量元素引起的。建议患者采用少食多餐的方式饮食,每天分5-6次吃饭。在日本,我们有时也会给患者用一些营养补充剂。

另外,也可以考虑采用中草药的对症治疗,改善症状,比如十全大补汤、六君子汤。 会诊结束后,李女士的心情得到了极大的平复。她对自己未来要走的路更清晰了,也对日本专家的细致指导和会诊的快速响应非常满意。

中国是消化道癌症发病数量较多的国家,根据国家癌症中心发布的《2022年中国恶性肿瘤疾病负担情况》数据,2022年我国胃癌新发病例约为35.87万例,死亡人数26.04万人。

总体来说,胃癌属于严重威胁我国国民生命健康的蕞常见癌症之一。胃癌如能在早、中期发现,还是有很大机会通过手术实现根治的,患者仍有一定机会得到临床治愈(术后5年不复发即为临床治愈)。

但在胃癌患者中,一部分人会因为【年龄较高】、伴有诸多【基础病】等问题,对手术存有疑虑,担心“下不来手术台”,甚至会放弃手术机会,选择吃药等姑息治疗。这样的选择真的正确吗?现如今的技术能否支持这类老年患者安全手术呢?接下来,我们一起看一个真实案例。

01七旬老人遭遇中期胃癌

一位七十多岁的“老胃病”项女士,因短时间体重骤降(8斤)前往就医。血液检测显示,她有一项指标异常升高。进一步检查发现,她的食道和胃连接的地方(贲门)以及胃的“外墙”(胃壁)都变得异常的厚,而且形状不均匀——这正是胃癌常见的表现。

医生随后通过胃镜检查和病例活检(取一小块组织观察上面的细胞),确诊了老人患有胃癌。由于还没有出现胃以外的远处其他器官的转移,也没有附近淋巴结转移,因此项女士的胃癌分期为中期。虽不是早期,但中期胃癌通常是可以手术的。为项女士提供诊疗的医生也表示,可以通过全胃切除手术实现根治。

但一来项女士已经七十多岁,二来她有20多年的糖尿病(手术伤口会更慢愈合、感染风险高、术后并发症风险高)、右肺还有一枚1.2厘米的肺结节。种种问题让老人和家人们都比较犹豫,担心扛不住治疗,最终“越治越糟”。在这样的背景下,项女士决定找一位足够权威的外科专家,来为自己进行全面评估,看看能不能兼顾好肿瘤根治以及手术的安全性。

不久后,项女士预约了来自日本癌研有明医院消化中心胃外科部长布部创也医生为自己提供指导。

02日本专家咨询内容分享

在充分了解了项女士的病情信息和全部资料后,布部创也医生给出了如下指导建议:首先,患者此前接受的是普通CT而非增强CT,胃镜也没有清晰展示食道上肿瘤具体侵犯的程度,因此很难得出精准的分期判断。

后面患者来癌研有明医院就医时,医疗团队会在治疗前为她做一套非常精细、全面的检查,此后就可以明确肿瘤情况了。届时如果发现患者的分期、肿瘤侵犯的范围确实和现在的结果相同,那么可以通过一个腹腔镜微创手术实现根治,损伤会非常小;如果届时发现肿瘤侵犯食道过多,则需要消化道联合食道外科共同进行胸腔镜手术治疗。

但无论是哪一种情况,患者都可以耐受手术,并且保留一部分胃。癌研有明医院是一家极为擅长肿瘤微创手术的知名癌症专科医院。在胃癌方面,2005年,医院开始导入腹腔镜,2019年又引入了达芬奇手术机器人,患者术后并发症更少了。如今,癌研有明医院98%的外科手术都采用微创。

受益于此,很多在别的医院需要胃全切的胃癌患者,到癌研有明后可以保留一部分胃,还能兼顾临床治愈。这对于术后患者的长期营养摄入和体重维持都很有帮助。布部创也医生所在科室的主要目标之一,正是在做到根治性切除的前提之下,将原本的胃全切术式变为次全胃切除术,尽可能为患者保留一些胃,让他们未来的生活质量得到提升。

那么项女士的糖尿病问题,会不会影响到手术呢?对此,布部创也医生认为完全不必担心,因为对于这类患者,癌研有明医院会进行详细的术前评估,并且有专业团队介入,从生活方式调整和专业治疗入手,帮助患者控制好血糖,让血糖水平达到符合手术的标准,从而降低术后愈合不良风险。

关于肺部的1.2厘米结节,布部医生认为可以暂不处理,无论它到底是良性还是恶性。因为这枚结节属于纯磨玻璃结节,即便是恶性,进展也非常缓慢,并不会快速出现转移扩散。而胃癌根治手术虽然会采用微创方式,但依然会给患者带来一定的负担,如果同时处理肺结节,会导致负担过重、患者难以承受。所以当前蕞好的处理办法,是先集中精力解决胃癌肿瘤,术后安排呼吸科专家为患者进行肺结节诊断,给出随访或手术或根治性放疗的建议。

03项女士术后,是否需要化疗来降低复发风险、争取更大治愈希望?

对此,布部创也医生表示,是否化疗现在还不能判断。因为术后患者能获得蕞精准的分期判断,有可能患者术前被认为是2期,但实际上术后成了1期(无需化疗);有时也可能患者术前是1期,但术后成了2-3期。假如是2-3期,则患者术后需要坚持1年的辅助化疗,大概可以降低10%的复发风险。

当地时间10月29日礼来宣布了Ⅲb期临床试验(TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 6)的积极结果,对于早期症状性阿尔茨海默病成人患者,用改良滴定方案接受donanemab治疗的患者在24周主要终点时,伴水肿/积液的淀粉样蛋白相关影像学异常(ARIA-E)有所减少。

donanemab这个新药在今年7月获批于美国,又在之后获日本厚生劳动省、英国药品和医疗产品监管局批准,用于轻度阿尔茨海默病、轻度认知功能障碍的治疗。donanemab在国内2023年取得突破性治疗药物认定,并纳入优先审评审批程序,目前还在审评审批过程中。

CDE官网截图

但在FDA说明书中有黑框警告,大意是应用该药时应注意淀粉样蛋白相关影像学异常(ARIA),表现为ARIA-E和ARIA伴含铁血黄素沉积(ARIA-H),通常发生在治疗早期,且无症状,很少发生严重和危及生命的事件。本次试验的积极结果和这个黑框警告相关。一起来看详情。

FDA说明书截图

给药方式有哪些改变?会不会影响效果?

TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 6是一项多中心随机双盲Ⅲb期研究,主要研究donanemab的不同给药方案对早期症状性AD患者ARIA-E和淀粉样蛋白清除率的影响,这里的早期AD指的是轻度认知障碍(MCI)和轻度痴呆疾病阶段。

给药方式和既往不同,既往标准给药方案是在前三次输注时接受2瓶(700mg)donanemab,然后再接受4瓶(1400mg);改良滴定方式是患者第一次输注1瓶(350mg),第二次输注2瓶(700mg),第三次输注3瓶(1050mg),此后每次输注4瓶(1400mg)。

研究的主要终点是第24周时患者出现ARIA-E占总参与者的比例,结果显示接受改良滴定方式的患者ARIA-E发生率为14%,而标准给药方案为24%,相对风险降低41%。载脂蛋白E(APOE)是已知的阿尔茨海默病遗传风险因素的携带者,在这些患者中,19%患者在改良滴定时患有ARIA-E,而标准给药方案中为57%,相对风险降低67%。

看到这里你或许也有疑问,虽然ARIA-E的发生风险降低了,但改良滴定方案会不会影响疗效?答案是不会。

与接受标准给药方案的患者相比,改良滴定患者淀粉样斑块和p-tau217减少。改良滴定的患者的淀粉样斑块水平较基线平均降低 67%,而标准给药组患者为69%。

参考来源

1.Modified Titration of Donanemab Demonstrated Reduction of ARIA-E in Early Symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease Patients in Phase Ⅲb study.

2.CED官网.

3.A Study of Different Donanemab (LY3002813) Dosing Regimens in Adults With Early Alzheimer's Disease (TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 6).

当地时间10月29日,阿西米尼(asciminib)获美国食品药品管理局(FDA)加速批准[1] ,用于慢性期新诊断的费城染色体阳性慢性粒细胞白血病(Ph+CML)成年患者。CML是一种骨髓和血细胞癌症,通常由费城染色体的异常染色体引起。在一线治疗中,约1/3的患者会出现下列问题:由于不良反应或者治疗无效而停止酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)治疗。

为了解决这一问题,需要开发新的药物,asciminib就是解决这一困境的新药。早在2022年8月,加拿大药物和卫生技术局(CADTH)建议[2] :“若满足条件,可通过公共药物计划报销asciminib用于治疗费城染色体阳性慢性粒细胞白血病。”

asciminib为何得到FDA的青睐?

本次获批基于一项III期多中心随机研究,研究目的是比较每日80mg的asciminib与TKI治疗的疗效。TKI治疗是接受伊马替尼、尼洛替尼、达沙替尼或博舒替尼任意一种治疗。

共有405名患者被随机分配(1:1)进两组治疗。主要疗效结局指标是48周时的主要分子反应(MMR)率。这个指标是慢性髓性白血病的关键指标,这个比例越高,说明该治疗在基因水平上对疾病的控制效果越好,能够更有效地抑制疾病相关基因的表达,进而有望更好地控制疾病的进展、改善患者的症状和预后。

研究结果显示,48周时MMR率方面,asciminib组中为68%(95% CI: 61, 74),TKI组为49%(95% CI: 42, 56),二者相差19%。细看具体的TKI,入组伊马替尼和其他TKI药物入组比例为1:1;asciminib组的MMR率为69%(95% CI: 59, 78),而伊马替尼组为40%(95% CI: 31, 50),相差近30%(95% CI: 17, 42)。

这个新药安全吗?每周需要打几次药?

根据FDA数据显示,在新诊断和既往接受过治疗的患者,应用新药最常见的不良反应(≥20%)是肌肉骨骼疼痛、皮疹、疲劳、上呼吸道感染、头痛、腹痛和腹泻。若只看新诊断的患者,最常见的实验室异常(≥40%)是淋巴细胞计数降低、白细胞计数降低、血小板计数降低、中性粒细胞计数降低等。

根据FDA已批准的asciminib说明书,用药期间还需要注意一下事项:

1.骨髓抑制 :用药期间可能因出现骨髓抑制,发生血小板减少症、中性粒细胞减少症和贫血。用药应在治疗的前3个月,需要每两周进行一次全血细胞计数,此后每月进行一次检测,从而判断患者有无骨髓抑制症状。根据严重程度,咨询医生是否需要停药。

2.胰腺毒性 :患者可能出现血清脂肪酶和淀粉酶无症状升高,每月需评估血清脂肪酶和淀粉酶水平,如果您有胰腺炎,则注意主动告知医生,需要进行频率更高的检测。

3.高血压风险 :可能出现3级或4级高血压风险,应注意检测血压。

4.超敏反应 :可能出现3级或4级超敏反应,包括皮疹、水肿和支气管痉挛。如果出现这些症状,需及时反馈医生,医生会根据超敏反应的体征和症状,开始适当的治疗。

5.心血管毒性 :如果您有心血管病史,需要告知医生;对于3级或更高级别的心血管毒性,医生会考虑暂停用药、减少剂量或永久停药。

6.胚胎/胎儿毒性 :若您在怀孕期间用药或在服用药物期间怀孕,可能对孩子有潜在风险。这个新药是口服药,需要根据不同的给药剂量(80mg或40mg)每天/或每两天用药。

近些年来,还有哪些白血病药物获批FDA?

根据FDA肿瘤学/血液系统恶性肿瘤批准通知,白血病相关新药整理如下表。

另外可以看出21年时asciminib已获批白血病治疗,但限定既往接受过两种或更多TKIs治疗,本次获批属于扩大适应证。

参考来源:

1.FDA grants accelerated approval to asciminib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. 2.Asciminib(Scemblix):CADTHReimbursementRecommendation:Indication:ForthetreatmentofadultpatientswithPhiladelphiachromosome-positivechronicmyeloidleukemia(Ph+CML)inchronicphase(CP)previouslytreatedwith2ormoretyrosinekinaseinhibitors.Ottawa(ON):CanadianAgencyforDrugsandTechnologiesinHealth;2022Aug.PMID:38713779. 3.AStudyofOralAsciminibVersusOtherTKIsinAdultPatientsWithNewlyDiagnosedPh+CML-CP. 4.Product information:SCEMBLIX-asciminibtablet,filmcoated.UpdatedAugust7,2024. 5.Oncology(Cancer)/HematologicMalignanciesApprovalNotifications.

以下内容来源于新英格兰医学杂志。

Presentation of Case

Dr. Carrie Chui (Neurology): A 79-year-old man was admitted to this hospital because of involuntary movements on the left side and transient unresponsiveness.
The patient had been in his usual state of health until 9 months before admission, when involuntary movements of the left shoulder and left side of the face developed. The movements were described by the patient as twitching, were not associated with a change in the level of consciousness, and resolved after 1 to 2 minutes. During the next 6 months, the patient had similar episodes approximately once per month, but the episodes increased in duration, lasting 5 to 6 minutes.
Three months before admission, the episodes of involuntary movements increased in frequency, and the patient was evaluated by his primary care physician. The physical examination was normal. Results of kidney-function tests were normal, as were blood levels of glucose and electrolytes, except for the sodium level, which was 129 mmol per liter (reference range, 135 to 145). There was a history of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion, and the sodium level was similar to levels obtained during the past 4 years. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the head (Figure 1A), performed before and after the administration of intravenous contrast material, revealed a focus of enhancement in the right middle frontal gyrus that was thought to be a small vascular anomaly. Electroencephalography (EEG), performed with the patient in awake and drowsy states, revealed rare, brief, focal slowing in the left temporal lobe during drowsiness; no epileptiform abnormalities were present.
Figure 1
MRI of the Head and CT Angiogram of the Head and Neck.
Two months before admission, the patient was evaluated in the epilepsy clinic affiliated with this hospital. He reported that the episodes of involuntary movements had increased in both frequency and duration, occurring once or twice per day and lasting approximately 10 minutes. Episodes began with tingling and numbness in the left leg that prompted the patient to voluntarily stomp the left foot to relieve the uncomfortable sensation. Then, the patient had involuntary movements that he described as an uncontrollable invisible force moving the left leg and arm, with hyperextension of the arm backward and pronation of the wrist. There was associated numbness in the distal portions of the left third, fourth, and fifth fingers and involuntary movement of the left cheek. No prodromal symptoms occurred. The patient had awareness during the episodes, and after the episodes, he felt fatigued but had a normal level of consciousness, without confusion. The examination in the epilepsy clinic was normal. A diagnosis of seizure disorder was considered, and treatment with levetiracetam was started.
Three weeks before admission, the patient was again evaluated in the epilepsy clinic. He reported that the episodes of involuntary movements still occurred on a daily basis but had decreased in duration and involved only the left leg, without abnormal movements of the arm or face. Dizziness, headache, and weakness had developed and were attributed to the use of levetiracetam. The patient’s family had recorded a video of one of the episodes of involuntary movements. After reviewing the video, the patient’s neurologist thought that the episodes were less likely to be caused by seizures and more consistent with choreoathetoid movements. Cross-tapering of medications — with the simultaneous administration of levetiracetam in decreasing doses and clobazam in increasing doses — was initiated, and the patient was referred to the movement disorders clinic affiliated with this hospital.
On the morning of admission, an episode of involuntary movements of the left leg and left shoulder occurred and persisted for 1 hour. Several hours after the symptoms abated, the patient’s wife found the patient to be unresponsive; he was sitting in a chair. Emergency medical services were called, and when they arrived, the patient was responsive. The fingerstick blood glucose level was 180 mg per deciliter (10.0 mmol per liter) and the blood pressure 110/80 mm Hg. The patient was transported to the emergency department of this hospital for further evaluation.
In the emergency department, the patient reported dysuria and increased urinary frequency. The patient’s daughter noted that he had been more anxious during the past 3 years and occasionally had trouble with memory. Other medical history included Barrett’s esophagus, benign prostatic hypertrophy, chronic hepatitis B virus infection, eczema, gastroesophageal reflux disease, hypertension, nonischemic cardiomyopathy, and osteoporosis. There was no history of head trauma or extended loss of consciousness. Medications included aspirin, atorvastatin, doxazosin, finasteride, omeprazole, metoprolol, sacubitril, and valsartan. There were no known drug allergies. The patient was a lifelong nonsmoker and drank alcohol rarely; he did not use illicit drugs. His mother had had gastric cancer, and his sister had had esophageal cancer; there was no family history of seizures.
On examination, the temporal temperature was 36.8°C, the blood pressure 152/97 mm Hg, the pulse 65 beats per minute, the respiratory rate 16 breaths per minute, and the oxygen saturation 96% while the patient was breathing ambient air. The body-mass index (the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) was 21.7. The blood pressure decreased to 130/63 mm Hg with standing. The patient was alert and interactive. The lower jaw was held to the left, but the nasolabial folds and smile were symmetric with activation. There were nonrhythmic, nonstereotyped, writhing movements of the left arm. Tone was normal, and strength was assessed as 5 out of 5 in the arms and legs. Results of liver-function and kidney-function tests were normal, as were blood levels of glucose and electrolytes, except for the sodium level, which was 125 mmol per liter. The lactate level was 2.1 mmol per liter (19 mg per deciliter; reference range, 0.5 to 2.0 mmol per liter [5 to 18 mg per deciliter]). The urinalysis was normal. Intravenous fluids were administered. Imaging studies were obtained.
Dr. Rajiv Gupta: Computed tomographic (CT) angiography of the head and neck (Figure 1B) revealed extensively calcified plaque with severe stenosis of the distal right common carotid artery (CCA), extending into the proximal right internal carotid artery (ICA), as well as stenosis of the right and left paraclinoid ICAs and the left vertebral artery at its origin. There was no vascular abnormality on the CT angiogram that corresponded to the abnormality in the right middle frontal gyrus seen on the previous MRI.
Dr. Chui: The patient was admitted to the hospital. On the second hospital day, the sodium level had increased to 130 mmol per liter, and the lactate level was normal. Additional imaging studies were obtained.
Dr. Gupta: MRI of the head showed no evidence of acute infarction. The focus of enhancement in the right frontal lobe that had been noted previously was not seen on the current MRI.
Dr. Chui: Blood levels of thyrotropin, cobalamin, and glycated hemoglobin and results of coagulation tests were normal. Screening tests for Lyme disease, tuberculosis, and syphilis were negative, as were tests for antibodies to cardiolipin and β2-glycoprotein. A test for antinuclear antibodies was positive, at a titer of 1:160 in a homogeneous pattern. During a physical therapy session, the patient had abnormal movements of the left leg, left arm, and left side of the face. The abnormal movements diminished when the patient used distraction techniques, such as thigh tapping, finger snapping, and walking while holding a glass of water.
The transient unresponsiveness that led to the patient’s admission was attributed to a combination of sedation from clobazam and hypovolemia. Treatment with clobazam was stopped, and hydration was encouraged. A diagnosis of functional neurologic disorder was considered; outpatient physical therapy with continued use of distraction techniques was recommended. The patient was discharged home on the third hospital day.
Episodes of involuntary movements continued to occur on a daily basis at home. Two weeks after discharge, when the patient was doing exercises while sitting in a chair and having a conversation with his wife, he suddenly stopped talking. She found him slumped in the chair with his eyes closed, no longer exercising. When she asked him questions, he repeatedly said “yes.” Emergency medical services were called, and when they arrived, the patient was alert, diaphoretic, and nonverbal. He had a facial droop on the left side and a right gaze preference. The fingerstick blood glucose level was 130 mg per deciliter (7.2 mmol per liter) and the blood pressure 120/60 mm Hg. The patient was transported to the emergency department of this hospital for further evaluation.
In the emergency department, the temporal temperature was 36.6°C, the blood pressure 143/63 mm Hg, the pulse 66 beats per minute, the respiratory rate 18 breaths per minute, and the oxygen saturation 98% while the patient was breathing ambient air. He was alert and interactive. There was a facial droop on the left side. There was no effort against gravity in the left arm. The patient was able to lift the left leg off the bed for 1 to 2 seconds. He had a right gaze deviation that could not be overcome and mild dysarthria. The remainder of the examination was normal. A diagnosis of stroke was considered, and emergency CT angiography was performed.
Dr. Gupta: CT angiography showed no evidence of acute territorial infarction and no changes in cerebrovascular disease.
Dr. Chui: On repeat physical examination performed after CT angiography, the gaze deviation and dysarthria had resolved, and strength was normal. Mild facial paralysis was present.
A diagnosis was made.

Differential Diagnosis

Dr. Albert Y. Hung: This 79-year-old man initially presented with involuntary movements of the left shoulder and face without associated loss of consciousness. Diagnosis of an unusual movement disorder, especially one that is present episodically, can be challenging. Videos brought in by the patient can be very useful. 1 Most movement disorders result from abnormal functioning of extrapyramidal circuits involving the basal ganglia, rather than a specific neuroanatomical lesion, and the first step toward diagnosis is to identify the type of abnormal movements. 2
Four salient aspects of this patient’s involuntary movements can help in characterizing the movement disorder before generating a differential diagnosis. First, the movements were paroxysmal, lasting for short periods of time with resolution between episodes. Second, the movements were nonstereotyped, appearing randomly and variably. Third, the movements were restricted to the left side of his body throughout the course, localizing the disease process to the right cerebral hemisphere. Finally, the symptoms were progressive, increasing in both duration and frequency.

Movement Disorders

This patient had abnormal involuntary movements, symptoms indicative of a hyperkinetic movement disorder. Tremor, the most common hyperkinetic disorder, is unlikely because the patient did not have rhythmic movements. Dystonia is also unlikely, because he did not have sustained muscle contractions that were causing twisting or abnormal postures of the legs, arms, head, neck, or face. Although the patient initially described the movements as twitching, his later descriptions are not suggestive of myoclonus or tics, which manifest as sudden, rapid, recurrent movements.
This patient’s neurologist described the involuntary movements as “choreoathetoid” after reviewing a video of an episode. Chorea, athetosis, and ballism make up a spectrum of involuntary movements that often occur in combination. Chorea refers to involuntary movements that are “dancelike” — irregular, random, unintended, and flowing from one body part to another. When these movements are slow and writhing (with a lower amplitude) and involve the distal limbs, the term athetosis is used. The presence of both chorea and athetosis in the same patient is referred to as choreoathetosis. When the movements are fast and flinging (with a higher amplitude) and involve the proximal limbs, the term ballism is used. Although the description of this patient’s movements was not clearly suggestive of ballism, hemichorea and hemiballismus often occur together.
The term dyskinesia can refer to any abnormal movements and is often used to describe hyperkinetic disorders that are induced by specific drugs, such as tardive dyskinesia induced by dopamine antagonists or dyskinesia induced by levodopa in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Often, dyskinesia manifests as chorea or choreoathetoid movements, but chorea and dyskinesia are not synonymous. This patient appears to have involuntary dyskinesia with choreoathetosis as the primary phenomenology. Before constructing a differential diagnosis for dyskinesia in this patient, I will consider two conditions that mimic dyskinesia: seizures and functional movement disorder.

Seizures

Various movement disorders may be mistaken for seizures, although these movement disorders are not associated with EEG abnormalities during the episode. Patients with some forms of epilepsy may present with abnormal movements without other features that are typically associated with seizures, such as aura, change in responsiveness, incontinence, or a postictal state. 3,4 Seizures were initially suspected in this patient, and he was referred to the epilepsy clinic. Recurrent focal seizures were probably suspected because of the transient nature of the episodes. Initial MRI had shown a small abnormality in the right middle frontal gyrus, but this finding was not seen on follow-up imaging, which makes it unlikely to be related to the overall presentation. Baseline EEG had shown only brief left temporal slowing, without epileptiform abnormalities. The EEG was an interictal study, so the findings do not rule out seizures. However, the slowing was ipsilateral to the abnormal movements, so it is unlikely to be related to the episodes. In addition, the patient’s involuntary movements were nonstereotyped and nonrhythmic, which makes his presentation unlikely to be due to a seizure disorder.

Functional Movement Disorder

Because this patient’s movements diminished with the use of distraction techniques, a diagnosis of functional movement disorder was considered. Most cases of functional movement disorder begin abruptly after a trigger, such as a mild physical injury or illness; a psychological stressor can be present but is not required for diagnosis. Symptoms are typically most severe around the time of onset and may wax and wane over time. Although distractibility is a finding associated with functional disorders, abnormal movements that occur with nonfunctional syndromes can sometimes be suppressed by action or incorporated into voluntary movements in a manner that may appear distractible. Several clinical features in this patient make a diagnosis of functional disorder unlikely. Functional movement disorder is more common in women than in men, and the average age at onset is 40 years. 5 In addition, tremor is the most common clinical phenotype seen in patients with functional movement disorder; chorea or choreoathetosis, which was seen in this patient, is very unusual in patients with functional movement disorder. Overall, functional movement disorder is unlikely to explain this patient’s presentation.

Dyskinesia

Primary paroxysmal dyskinesia refers to a group of heterogeneous syndromes characterized by recurrent involuntary movements that occur episodically and abruptly, without loss of consciousness. 6 These disorders usually begin in childhood or young adulthood. Both the age of this patient and the described phenomenology make a diagnosis of primary paroxysmal dyskinesia unlikely.
The differential diagnosis in this case is therefore focused on causes of secondary dyskinesia, of which there are many. 7 MRI ruled out the presence of a mass lesion suggestive of cancer. The patient had no history of acute illness suggestive of a viral or other infectious encephalitis, and there was no history of trauma or exposure to drugs or other toxins. Although his daughter mentioned trouble with memory, there was no compelling history suggestive of a neurodegenerative disease.
A common metabolic cause of secondary dyskinesia is diabetic striatopathy, a syndrome involving the acute-to-subacute onset of chorea and ballism in the context of hyperglycemia. 8 This syndrome can occur as the initial manifestation of type 2 diabetes mellitus or as a complication of poorly controlled diabetes. Diabetic striatopathy is more likely to develop in women than in men, and the average age at onset is 70 years. Most patients present with hemichorea and hemiballismus, rather than bilateral symptoms. CT shows hyperdensity, and T1-weighted MRI shows hyperintensity, in the contralateral basal ganglia. However, this patient had no history of diabetes and had a normal blood glycated hemoglobin level, features that rule out a diagnosis of diabetic striatopathy.
Choreiform movements can also be a manifestation of autoimmune conditions. 9 This patient’s initial presentation with unilateral shoulder and face movements would have suggested the possibility of faciobrachial dystonic seizures associated with anti–leucine-rich, glioma-inactivated 1 (anti-LGI1) encephalitis. 10 This condition is often associated with hyponatremia, which was present in this patient. However, as the case evolved, leg involvement and sensory changes developed that would be atypical for anti-LGI1 encephalitis.
One key clue in this case is that the patient did not have an isolated movement disorder. In addition to motor symptoms, he had a variety of sensory symptoms involving both the left arm and the left leg. His first hospital admission was precipitated by an episode of unresponsiveness. The clinical event that led to his second presentation to the emergency department was distinctly different: an acute onset of speech difficulty accompanied by left hemiparesis and right gaze deviation that was worrisome for an acute right middle cerebral artery (MCA) syndrome. The symptoms resolved without intervention, which indicates that he may have had an acute transient ischemic attack (TIA). The most relevant imaging finding was severe cerebrovascular disease, including severe stenosis of the distal right CCA and proximal right ICA. Could this patient’s movement disorder be explained by a vascular lesion?

Limb-Shaking TIAs

Limb-shaking TIAs were first described by C. Miller Fisher in 1962. 11 In most case reports, these episodes are associated with high-grade stenosis of the ICA, which was seen in this patient. 12,13 The mechanism is thought to be cerebral hypoperfusion, and changes in posture or head position that decrease cerebral blood flow can precipitate these episodes. In this patient, the first episode of unresponsiveness that led to hospital admission occurred when he was sitting. He then had an acute episode involving right gaze preference that was provoked by exercise and was very suggestive of a TIA in the right MCA territory. These findings are highly suggestive of a diagnosis of limb-shaking TIAs, and I would refer this patient for emergency carotid endarterectomy.

Clinical Impression and Initial Management

Dr. Scott B. Silverman: When I evaluated this patient, his transient right gaze preference and left hemiparesis were consistent with a right MCA syndrome due to a TIA from symptomatic severe stenosis of the right ICA. The mechanism of this event was either artery-to-artery embolism or hypoperfusion. His previous, recurrent episodes of transient choreoathetosis on the left side that had occurred mainly while he was sitting, standing, or exercising were consistent with limb-shaking TIAs from hypoperfusion or low flow.
The pathogenesis of a low-flow state related to severe carotid stenosis resulting in limb-shaking TIAs is described in a small case series. 14 In six out of eight patients, the transient, stereotyped, involuntary movements were eliminated with carotid artery revascularization. Positional cerebral ischemia in patients without orthostatic hypotension has been described. 15
Treatment with atorvastatin was continued, the dose of aspirin was increased to 325 mg per day, and an intravenous heparin infusion was started. The strategy of permissive hypertension was used, with high blood pressure allowed to a maximum systolic blood pressure of 180 mm Hg. The patient was admitted to the stroke service, and carotid artery duplex ultrasonography was performed.
Dr. Gupta: Doppler ultrasonography of the carotid arteries (Figure 2) revealed markedly elevated Doppler flow velocities within the proximal right ICA. There was a parvus et tardus waveform in the distal right ICA, a finding indicative of low flow related to the more proximal high-grade stenosis. The Doppler waveform contours had poststenotic turbulence.
Figure 2
Doppler Ultrasound Image.
Dr. Silverman: The vascular surgery service was consulted, and the patient underwent right carotid endarterectomy.

Clinical Diagnosis

Limb-shaking transient ischemic attacks.

Dr. Albert Y. Hung’s Diagnosis

Limb-shaking transient ischemic attacks due to severe carotid stenosis, with secondary paroxysmal dyskinesia.

Pathological Discussion

Dr. Caroline F. Hilburn: The endarterectomy specimen included the carotid bifurcation and was notable for firm arterial walls, a finding consistent with calcification. On gross examination (Figure 3A), a large plaque was centered at the carotid bifurcation and protruded into the lumen, resulting in a maximal luminal stenosis of 80%. The plaque had an irregular and focally friable surface. On microscopic examination (Figure 3B), the plaque was characterized by extensive calcification. Some regions of the plaque had a smooth, healed fibrous cap, whereas other regions had an irregular surface suggestive of ulceration, which indicated potential sites of plaque rupture. Multiple smaller calcified plaques were present, affecting both branches of the artery.
Figure 3
Endarterectomy Specimen.

Pathological Diagnosis

Complex atherosclerotic plaque with portions of attached media.

Additional Management

Dr. Silverman: After the procedure, the patient had an uneventful recovery and was discharged home on the fifth hospital day. He was seen 1 month after discharge in the stroke prevention clinic. There had been no further episodes of involuntary movements or choreoathetosis and no stroke or TIA. The patient continues to take aspirin, atorvastatin, and antihypertensive medications.

Final Diagnosis

Limb-shaking transient ischemic attacks.
打开京东APP
实惠又轻松
打开京东APP
京ICP备11041704号
京公网安备 11000002000088号